B.C.’s COVID rules for industrial sites too little, too late, critics say

After months of calls to shut down industrial work sites in northern B.C. due  to concerns they’re COVID-19 “incubators,” and 250 cases at five  projects, Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry has finally taken  action. But critics say it’s too little, too late. 
 
“We now  have our first Elder in ICU in hospital because of an LNG worker — it  was just a matter of time,” said Sley’do Molly Wickham, a member of the  Gidimt’en clan of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation, upon whose territory  the Coastal GasLink pipeline is being built. 
 
“More and  more Wet’suwet’en people are getting [COVID],” she added. “Most of the  cases I know of have gotten it directly from somebody who works at LNG Canada or somebody that works on the Coastal GasLink project.”
 
On Dec. 29, in response to the increasing number of cases at work sites and  associated transmission to northern communities, Henry issued a public health officer order requiring five major industrial sites — including LNG Canada and Coastal GasLink — to scale back their operations. 
 
“There is  an immediate and urgent need for focused action to reduce the rate of  the transmission of COVID-19 associated with the projects,” Henry said  in the order.
 
However, companies are permitted to rapidly rebuild their workforces starting this week.
 
The order  follows several complaints of unsafe working conditions at LNG Canada.  Just a week before the order, industrial janitors at the site voted overwhelmingly in favour of striking due in part to poor health and safety protections. Months earlier,  WorkSafeBC conducted investigations into complaints from LNG Canada  workers about insufficient COVID-19 cleaning procedures, which were first reported in The Narwhal. 
 
WorkSafeBC also inspected the Site C work camp’s sewage treatment facility and found the facility did not  have a plan to sufficiently protect workers from COVID-19.  
 
The order  also follows six open letters to Henry from concerned individuals and  groups calling for the work sites to be shut down, including three  letters from Indigenous groups, one signed by hundreds of frontline health workers and another signed by 15 non-profit organizations.
The first letter came from former Northern Health chief medical officer David Bowering  just 10 days after the state of emergency was declared last March. “The  camps are and will be COVID-19 incubators placing the workers, the host  communities and the home communities of the workers at unacceptable  risk,” he predicted in his letter.
 
A letter from more than 20 Wet’suwet’en matriarchs, or Ts’ako ze’, followed in November and emphasized the risks to Indigenous Peoples, who are more likely to contract the virus and experience complications due to existing health issues.  
 
“The economy cannot come before Indigenous lives,” they wrote. 
 
Bowering  told The Narwhal he welcomes the new restrictions but that they’re long  overdue. “My first reaction is a bit of disappointment that [the  province] carried that risk so long,” he said. “And then finally, when  it’s impossible to ignore it, they take some action.”
 
Here’s everything you need to know about the public health order and the people and projects affected. 
 
Why did Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry issue this COVID-19 public health order for work sites? 
 
Henry’s  order states that there has been a “rapid increase” in the number of  COVID-19 cases associated with large-scale industrial projects in  northern B.C., which has resulted in the spread of the disease to  surrounding communities, including Indigenous communities. 
 
Henry said the seasonal slowdown offered an opportunity to help “break the cycle of transmission.” 
 
“A rapid  return to full operating capacity on the part of large-scale industrial  operations … will likely further fuel and accelerate the cycle of  transmission of COVID-19 among the workers and the surrounding  communities,” the order says.
 
Henry  pointed out that Northern Health doesn’t have the capacity to handle a  high volume of cases. The health authority serves around 300,000 people  and has just 41 critical care beds plus an additional 23 beds it can use  if necessary. 
 
In early December, Northern Health said it had started to transfer patients to other health authorities due to the increasing number of cases in the region. As of Jan. 7, the  region has had 2,338 confirmed cases and 32 deaths. There are 438 active  cases, with 38 people hospitalized including 16 in intensive care.
 
Henry  added that it’s challenging for public health officials to respond to  cases at remote work sites and industrial camps, and a high volume of  cases makes contract tracing challenging. 
 
Also,  because work on industrial projects is typically done in shifts that  last for days or weeks with workers living on-site, asymptomatic workers  could unknowingly transmit the virus to the work site from their home  communities and vice versa.  
 
In a  statement, the Ministry of Health told The Narwhal this informed the  decision: “We know many of these camps have workers coming and returning  from across the province — as well as outside the province — and  limiting the amount of workers allowed to return to these five project  sites and associated camps at one period of time will assist in managing  the potential impact of additional COVID-19 activity in Northern  Health.”  
 
What industrial projects in northern B.C. are affected by the public health order? 
 
The public health order includes LNG Canada in Kitimat and its associated pipeline project, Coastal GasLink. It also includes BC Hydro’s Site C dam, a small section of the Trans Mountain pipeline near Valemount and a hydroelectric project to provide power to the Rio Tinto aluminum smelter in Kitimat.
 
How many COVID-19 cases in total have been linked to industrial work sites in northern B.C.? 
 
There have  been 250 cases reported between the five industrial projects, but  Northern Health said it only has case numbers related to outbreaks, not  individual cases nor clusters. Each case and cluster is assessed on a  number of factors, such as location and potential contact with other  individuals, and depending on the results an outbreak may or may not be  declared. Sometimes, just one case can be deemed an outbreak. This means  that the true number of cases related to the projects could be larger.
 
As of Jan. 7, the only active case reported is in isolation at Site C.
 
The health  authority was also unable to confirm how many community cases have been  linked to the industrial sites but said it is aware of workers  transmitting the virus to close contacts, such as household members. 
 
LNG Canada reported two outbreaks, one on Nov. 19 and a second on Dec. 17, with a  total of 72 cases. Northern Health declared the first outbreak over on  Dec. 25 and stated there are no active cases associated with the second  outbreak as of Dec. 30.
 
One  confirmed outbreak between two Coastal GasLink work camps has resulted  in 56 confirmed cases, with no cases still active, according to Northern  Health. 
 
Site C has  had 31 cases related to the project since the beginning of the  pandemic, with just one case remaining active as of Jan. 7.
 
Trans  Mountain has reported a total of 91 cases since the beginning of the  pandemic. Rio Tinto referred The Narwhal to Northern Health to get the  number of cases associated with its project, but Northern Health was  unable to provide that information prior to publication.
 
How have the numbers of workers at industrial sites in northern B.C. changed due to the public health order? 
 
LNG Canada told The Narwhal a total of 3,200 employees worked on the project prior  to the December holiday season, but noted that there were only about  2,000 people on-site at a time due to the nature of shift work. The  order reduced the number of workers to 450 and permitted an additional  400 to return on Jan. 6. It allows for an increase to 1,100 by the end  of the month.
 
According to Coastal GasLink’s construction updates,  the project had over 4,000 workers in the field at the beginning of  December. The order required a reduction to just 400 people until  February, at which point it can bring back an additional 600 workers.  The company did not respond to requests for further information prior to  publication.
 
A spokesperson for BC Hydro said the Site C project has been operating with reduced staff throughout the pandemic but had  about 1,450 workers in camp at the beginning of December. The project  was required to reduce its staff to 400 until Jan. 7, at which point it  can increase its workforce to 800. By Jan. 21, the project can bring  back another 300 workers.
 
Trans  Mountain was unable to provide The Narwhal with the number of workers  normally at the Valemount camp prior to publication, but it was required  to reduce its workforce to 50, increasing to 150 in early January and  up to 600 by mid-February.
 
Rio Tinto  was required to cut its project workforce in half — from 320 to 160. The  order permitted an increase of up to 280 people in early January. 
 
According  to the Ministry of Health, the baseline numbers represent the number of  workers that remained at each project over the holidays.
 
Before a  company can increase its workforce beyond the limits outlined in the  order, it has to submit a “restart plan” to the provincial health  officer and Northern Health’s chief medical officer. The plan is  required to detail how the company will manage increasing the number of  workers while reducing the risk of COVID-19 transmission both on-site  and in surrounding communities. Companies will be required to limit the  movement of workers between job sites as much as possible and ensure  workers stay for a minimum two-week period at the new location after any  move.
 
What COVID-19 restrictions were already in place at industrial projects in northern B.C.?
 
Soon after  declaring a state of emergency, B.C. deemed industries such as mining  and oil and gas “essential” and issued a set of guidelines for industrial operations through the BC Centre for Disease Control. As long as an industrial  site had a safety plan approved by the health authority or the province,  and on-site modifications for safety protocols in place, it was allowed  to continue business as usual. 
 
According to the provincial guidelines for industrial sites,  workers were permitted to travel to surrounding communities when not  working but were advised against going into any public establishments,  and employers were told to recommend minimizing the number of workers  frequenting places like grocery stores.  
 
According  to the Ministry of Health statement, these guidelines are currently  being updated to restrict travel between industrial camps and local  communities. More information about the updates will be provided over  the next few weeks.
 
“These  restrictions will include workers remaining in camps during off-hours  and modifying transportation requirements to increase physical  distancing,” the statement said.
 
What makes industrial projects ‘essential services’ anyway?
 
No one really knows — not even government officials. 
 
According to the B.C. government, essential services are “daily services essential to preserving life, health, public safety and basic societal functioning.” 
 
Emergency  Management BC, a division of the Ministry of Public Safety, told The  Narwhal it drafted a list of essential services, collected input from  all of the other government ministries and then produced a final list. 
 
According to a CBC report,  members of the government struggled to justify defining industrial  projects like Site C and LNG Canada as essential. CBC obtained internal  government documents that questioned the designation and asked if an  exemption list would be created.
 
“I can’t  argue Site C, LNG Canada, etc. are essential,” then-deputy minister of  energy, mines and petroleum resources Dave Nikolesjin wrote in an email  to a colleague, which was obtained by CBC. 
 
Henry attempted to justify the classification at a press conference on March 30. “I think it’s important to recognize you can’t just abandon a large  mine or industrial site,” she said. “That’s not safe, it’s not safe for  the community, or for the environment as well.”           
 
Critics  argue that projects like the construction of a pipeline or LNG facility  have nothing to do with basic societal functioning. 
 
“What’s  the definition of essential?” Bowering asked. “It certainly doesn’t fit  mine, and it probably doesn’t meet most people’s in the north.” 
 
Why is LNG Canada being flagged for unsafe COVID-19 conditions?
 
The LNG  Canada employees who filed complaints with WorkSafeBC said the COVID-19  cleaning procedures in common areas, rooms and work spaces were  insufficient. WorkSafeBC inspectors conducted investigations on Aug. 28  and Oct. 19 and noted the cleaning schedule was not posted in high-risk  areas and discussed cleaning procedures and the need for COVID-19  instructions in individual rooms with representatives from the  subcontractor and Northern Health. An LNG Canada spokesperson told The Narwhal WorkSafeBC didn’t take further action as a result of the inspections.  
 
There have  since been more complaints about COVID-19 measures at LNG Canada.  According to Gary Hill, an industrial janitor who works at the LNG  Canada site for a subcontractor, Dexterra, he and his coworkers have  been complaining about insufficient COVID-19 protocols for months. Hill  said his team was not provided with sufficient personal protective  equipment like masks and gloves. He described the working conditions as  unsafe. 
 
“When we finish our [safety] meeting, we load up in the van, and there’s six or seven of [us] all squished together,” he said. 
 
The  workers are moved between various facilities on the project site,  cleaning for 10 to 11 hours a day, Hill said. The industrial janitors  recently voted 84 per cent in favour of a strike for safer working conditions. A union representative said discussions  with Dexterra are underway and further action will be taken depending on  the results. 
 
“One of my  co-workers retired and went home in October or November, and he went  home with the COVID,” Hill said. The former colleague isolated with his  daughter in Prince Rupert and she contracted the virus. Hill said both  have since recovered.
 
He said  the real risk is workers travelling to and from the site. “You got  people from the United States, you got people from Alberta, you have  people from all over the world working.”
 
According to the LNG Canada website,  the project has a policy in place that forbids all non-local workers  “from leaving the project site, and other work areas, or [visiting] any  public establishments when they are on rotation.” However, local  workers, who work alongside those from other regions, commute between  the project site and their home communities. 
 
When The Narwhal spoke with Wickham before the public health order, she said she regularly observed Coastal  GasLink workers on Wet’suwet’en territory who were not following basic  COVID-19 protocols like social distancing and wearing masks. 
 
Who is making sure industrial projects follow COVID-19 rules and how?
 
As  mandated by the Ministry of Health, WorkSafe BC conducts regular routine  and non-routine inspections at industrial sites, both in-person and  remote. Two weeks before the public health order, the Ministry of Health  strengthened enforcement by increasing the number of in-person  inspections. A WorkSafeBC representative was unable to say how many  inspections were being done previously and how many are being down now.
 
According  to WorkSafeBC, if an inspector finds any evidence of non-compliance with  the public health order, the local health authority will be contacted  for enforcement and further action. 
 
Northern  Health said it is actively working with industrial sites in “developing  safety plans, which includes case and contact management, and reporting  to the health authority.”
 
The  Ministry of Health statement said “operators who choose to disregard  health orders can face enforcement actions such as fines and/or further  orders to temporarily cease operations.” 
 
How will this public health order affect the projects? 
 
The new restrictions are affecting the five projects in different ways. 
 
An LNG Canada spokesperson said the order will not impact the project’s schedule. “We  remain committed to delivering first cargo by the middle of this  decade.”
 
Coastal GasLink did not respond to requests for an interview or information, but a  statement on its website said both of the camps where there were  outbreaks remain closed to non-essential workers. “We are conferring  with our contractors to develop remobilization plans that safeguard the  health of our workforce and neighbouring communities, as well as abide  by the new health order.”
 
A statement from BC Hydro noted that the order “does not impact people  working on the project that live locally or those that work on off-dam  site activities such as clearing, transmission construction and Highway  29 work.” But, it added, “these changes will have a further impact on  our overall project schedule and cost.” 
 
As The Narwhal recently reported, the Site C project is already facing delays and unknown cost overruns, potentially in the billions.
 
According to Trans Mountain,  the order only impacts its Valemount work camp, which is one of five in  the province. A spokesperson told The Narwhal the company is reviewing  the impacts on the workforce and schedule.
 
A Rio Tinto spokesperson said the project to increase hydro capacity from its  facility at Kemano is on hold until the company can rebuild its  workforce to safely proceed. 
 
Does this public health order address the concerns of critics?
 
Bowering  said after his initial relief that some action was being taken, he found  himself shocked and confused by the fact that the number of workers is  permitted to rapidly increase. 
 
“Let’s not  just get back to business as usual, as fast as possible,” he said,  adding that any further decisions about how to proceed should have  Indigenous representatives at the table. 
 
He said a  majority of the workers come from Alberta, which puts the province’s  decision to keep pushing forward with these projects in direct  contradiction to its efforts to prevent the spread of the virus. 
 
“The order  should say you can’t have people flying into the province to do work  for us, on things that you could argue aren’t essential at all, while  everything else is shut down and everyone else is putting their lives on  hold,” he said. “No one else in the country, and certainly not in B.C.,  is expected to travel … but these large conglomerations of people have  been not only allowed to, but are almost encouraged to because these  full-speed-ahead projects are being promoted.”
 
Bowering  was careful to note that the decision would have been made by the  province, not by Henry herself. “I actually feel sorry for her having to  be caught in the middle of that, trying to present some kind of public  health rationale where none can possibly exist.”
 
He said  the province recognizing the spread of the virus from these industrial  sites and work camps to Indigenous communities is a healthy step  forward. “To acknowledge that is really important.” 
 
Sierra  Club BC executive director Hannah Askew, who wrote one of the open  letters, told The Narwhal protecting Indigenous communities from the  virus is the least the province can do, given its history of  colonization and B.C.’s commitment to upholding the rights of Indigenous people. 
 
“COVID is directly seen as a threat to language preservation and language  revitalization efforts, because so many communities are dependent on a  tiny handful of language speakers who are often elderly and have other  health vulnerabilities,” she said. “It’s of the utmost importance to  protect them.”
 
Wickham is concerned that despite the public health order, the remoteness of the Coastal GasLink pipeline will make it hard for officials to monitor the company’s compliance. She  noted the number of Coastal GasLink workers in the area has dropped  dramatically since Dec. 29, but added there has been no direct  communication from the province or the company to the Wet’suwet’en.
 
“CGL is famous for not complying — they have dozens and dozens of non-compliance violations,” she said, referring to the company’s environmental track record.  “We’ll be monitoring very carefully as to how many people we’re seeing  on the territory. How much traffic are we seeing? Where are people  going?”
 
article continues below

Read Related Topics

Comments

NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Prince George Citizen welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. Comments that contain external links will not be permitted. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

Assisted dying POLL

Should the federal government expand access to medically-assisted dying?

or  view results

Popular Citizen

Lowest Gas Prices in Prince George
Prince George Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com