"Too much information" is a phrase my daughters use when they are told details about another's life and situation that does not need to be told to the general public.
That same phrase hit me as I read Mark Nielsen's report on the coroner's findings about the death of Shannon Parsons.
I know the Citizen has an obligation and responsibly to its readership to report accurately.
However, I question what purpose is served by listing the number of self-inflicted stab wounds found and Shannon Parsons mental state before her death. Is such information really 'necessary' to the public reporting of this sad story?
As the article states, her death occurred eleven months ago. I cannot help but believe the "too much information" nature of Mr. Nielsen's article borders on sensationalism and will only serve to open wide barely closed wounds of family and friend grief. What ultimate purpose is served by this?
Herb Hilder
Prince George
