Given the politics of our times, I suppose it's not surprising that UNBC's recent chancellor appointment should raise some level of controversy.
What's disappointing is what appears to be a considerable lack of objectivity in the discussion - especially in this context.
Regardless of what anyone thinks of Moore's politics, he did serve the Canadian people notably in government for many years.
He was in a position of public service for the good of all Canadians at the time.
Though the political winds have shifted slightly, should that mean someone like Moore cannot represent the interests of the university well?
I don't know Moore, and probably don't agree with all of his ideologies, but it seems to me that he is a worthy choice for this important role based on his past association with the university, his knowledge of this region and all of Canada (as well as world affairs), and his record of public service.
For all of these reasons he would undoubtedly represent the university on the Canadian and world stage very well.
Though he does not have a PhD and has not served in an academic environment, those matters should not disqualify him either.
The fact is, he is well-acquainted with university life and polity and has had a large role in Canadian public life.
His appointment, I think, stands as a wonderful credit to the university's respect for diversity on many fronts - something we should all appreciate and always seek to uphold.
As an original member of the university society, I'm sure I speak for many when I say that I hope the board does not give in to partisan politics however that may be construed in this case.
Edwin Drewlo
Prince George
