Parkade pit

Examining the parkade situation, the cost of construction is $34 million, for 351 stalls, around $100k per stall. Assuming a 50 year life, the parkade needs to make $1,800 a day to break even. Current stall rates are monthly maximums of $120. 

At full occupancy to recoup the costs of construction only, these lots would be $160 a month. Vacancy rates (higher now with coronavirus), are around 20 per cent in the city, so that would push the price up to around $200 a month for each stall in the parkade.

article continues below

Taking maintenance into account, the city spends around $550 per lot in ongoing maintenance, which adds another $9.5 million to the price of the lot. Rates would now need to be $260 a month just to account for the cost of maintenance and construction minus the staffing costs, which would be a dead net loss.

Assuming $100 per parkade spot per month over 50 years, gets us to around $17 million in revenues, minus $9 million or so in maintenance. The budget should have been set at no more than about $8 million in construction, not $34 million. The original budget of $12 million would have lead to a parking spot price, including construction and maintenance, of about $130 per month per parkade spot assuming 20 percent vacancy rates, $10 above the currently most expensive lots in the city and not taking into account staffing costs.

Two problems emerge from this analysis. 

One, the original budget did not adequately factor in maintenance costs or vacancy rates. The original budget would have rendered these parking spots uneconomical at the time of construction, which leads to the question.

Should the city have embarked on this project at the start? My numbers show that in order to break even the city could only have spent about $8 million on the construction of this parkade to price the lots at around $100/month for each stall, not $12.7 million as was budgeted for this project.

With a 50 per cent built in overrun, this project was not currently economical in Prince George at the outset. This falls on city council. Of the $34 million spent, only about $8 million will be recovered in 50 years, with a loss of $26 million to Prince George. 

Sean Ollech 

Prince George

Read Related Topics

Comments

NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Prince George Citizen welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. Comments that contain external links will not be permitted. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

Assisted dying POLL

Should the federal government expand access to medically-assisted dying?

or  view results

Popular Citizen

Lowest Gas Prices in Prince George
Prince George Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com