Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Child apprehensions put marginalized moms at greater risk, research finds

For years, Lauren has battled both substance use and British Columbia’s child welfare system as she attempts to keep her children out of foster care. “I was really trying to break that cycle for my children,” Lauren, who is Métis, told The Tyee.
Meaghan Thumath
Researcher Meaghan Thumath: ‘It really should be a rarity that poverty is a reason for child removal.’ Photo by Martin Dee, UBC.

For years, Lauren has battled both substance use and British Columbia’s child welfare system as she attempts to keep her children out  of foster care.

“I was really trying to break that cycle for my children,” Lauren, who is Métis, told The Tyee. 

Lauren’s first child, a son, was adopted  without her consent; she spent three years trying to get access to him,  without success.

The child welfare system again got involved  when she became pregnant with her second son, and then a daughter. As  her children grew, whenever Lauren relapsed and started using drugs  again, social workers would get involved and Lauren would fear losing  her remaining two children.

In the past, her kids were  allowed to stay with family members when she couldn’t care for them. But  around a year ago, Lauren’s worst nightmare came true: a relative who  was caring for her nine-year-old son asked for respite care and dropped  him off at a Ministry of Children and Family Development office.

Suddenly, her son ended up in foster care — a placement that would last three long months.

“I was hoping for the best,” Lauren said of  the foster home her son was placed in. “I was hoping for that one in a  million — because I was abused [in foster care] myself.”

Instead, Lauren said, the experience left her son traumatized.

“His heart is completely shattered, he’s broken. He can’t put all the pieces back together from foster care.”

The Tyee is using a pseudonym to protect the privacy of Lauren and her children.

Lauren doesn’t currently use drugs. But in  the past, the experience of being closely scrutinized by B.C.’s child  welfare system led her to avoid using drugs at a safe injection site  where she might be spotted.

That’s despite the huge risk of using any  illicit drug in B.C. From heroin to meth to cocaine, the entire illicit  supply is now tainted with the powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl or  other dangerous additives. Overdoses have killed nearly 7,000 people in  B.C. since 2016.

“As much as I would have liked to be able  to go to a safe place to use my drugs and be monitored to make sure that  I was OK, I couldn’t because I was afraid,” Lauren said. Many people  with addictions are able to hold down a job and love and parent their  children, she added.

“They’re still the same person everyone  knew before being labelled and scrutinized by the Ministry of Children  and Family Development.”

A new study published by the Centre for  Gender and Sexual Health Equity at the University of British Columbia  has found that B.C. mothers whose children are “forcibly removed” from  their care are 55 per cent more likely to have an overdose.

Among Indigenous women, the experience of  losing custody of their child doubled the odds of overdosing.  Researchers regularly surveyed over 1,000 marginalized women in Metro  Vancouver between 2010 and 2018.

Meaghan Thumath, a nurse and an assistant  professor in UBC’s school of nursing, was lead author of the study. She  works with women who are often involved with B.C.’s child welfare  system. Losing custody of a child is a hugely traumatic event and it can  lead women to relapse into more frequent and riskier substance use, she  said.

While the research paper  looked only at non-fatal overdoses, other research Thumath worked on  showed a much grimmer pattern: women who have had a child apprehended  have an increased chance of dying after their child has been removed from their care.

“You can’t get your kids back if you’ve passed away,” she said. “And that child has forever lost their parent.”

Thumath is raising the alarm now because  the combination of factors that lead women to overdose have only gotten  worse since her research concluded in 2018.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19  pandemic, B.C.’s illicit drug supply has become more dangerous and  overdose deaths have shot up. COVID-19 also increased trauma. For a few  months, in-person visits between parents and children in care were moved  online or cancelled entirely.

In June, the Ministry of Children and Family Development released a guide to help service providers “scale up” in-person visits.

The researchers point out that Canada has  one of the world’s highest rates of children in the care of the state,  and Indigenous children are massively over-represented: while Indigenous  kids make up only 7.7 per cent of children under 14 in Canada, 52.2 per  cent of children under 14 in care are Indigenous.

Like Lauren, many families have seen  generation after generation affected by state policies that tore  families apart, from residential schools to the ’60s Scoop to the modern foster-care system and are dealing with intergenerational trauma. 

Policies have changed in recent years, with  the Ministry of Children and Families saying it has attempted to change  its practices to keep children within their families and communities.  Ministry staff say the number of children in care is the lowest it’s  been in 30 years, and the number of Indigenous children in care is at  its lowest point in 20 years.

Still, Indigenous leaders and advocates say more needs to be done to keep families intact.

Dr. Janine Hardial is a family doctor who  works at Sheway, a clinic for women and their children in the Downtown  Eastside. Hardial said Thumath’s research matches what she sees her  patients go through.

“This is something we have observed for  years: a woman who is at very high risk of overdose, in that period  after her child or baby is apprehended and removed from her custody,”  Hardial said. 

“That trauma and loss is catastrophic for  some women, and that puts them at a high risk of relapse, especially if  they’ve had a period of stability prior to that — their risk of overdose  is even higher because of the changes to their opioid tolerance.”

Thumath says that if children do need to be  removed from their mother, women need to be offered counselling and  wrap-around support to deal with the trauma of that loss. And efforts  need to be made to continue visits between parent and child, something  that was interrupted by COVID-19 restrictions.

In most parts of B.C., in-person visits are back on, but it’s important they be considered an essential service, Thumath said. 

Thumath said it’s important to keep  children safe and there is a role for the child welfare system. But she  emphasized that the most common reason to remove a child from a parent’s  care isn’t abuse, but neglect — which, Thumath said, often just means  poverty.

“Neglect is really defined as being  homeless, often [living in] poverty or having food security issues,”  Thumath said. “It really should be a rarity that poverty is a reason for  child removal.” 

A woman’s drug use does not automatically mean there is a child protection concern, Hardial said.

In response to questions from The Tyee  about Thumath’s study, ministry communications staff wrote that removal  is a last resort and only done “if the child is either in immediate  danger or no measures are available and adequate to protect the child.”

“In instances where parental substance use  is identified as a contributing factor in the removal, the ministry  would refer the parent to supports that reduce risk and help them safely  reconnect with their child. With supports in place — including  counselling, addictions treatment and culturally specific services —  nearly 90 per cent of children who are found to be in need of protection  are able to return to living safely with their families,” ministry  staff wrote.

But Hardial said the kind of support  mothers are offered, and how fast that support is extended, often  depends on the social worker who is assigned to her.

Even if women are not able to parent full  time, “we have to be able to be creative and think out of the box and  think about how to preserve that relationship and minimize trauma for  the mom and the baby,” Hardial said.

That could take the form of frequent visits to maintain the relationship between mother and child.

“We have to do everything we can to support  her, to keep contact with the baby or child through visits — and hope  for reunification if that mother’s goal is to parent.”

Hardial said it’s common to see teenagers  who have come to the Downtown Eastside to search for the mothers they  lost contact with as young children. Sometimes, those teens are using  substances to deal with their own trauma.

“The loss of a parent, the grief of that, the trauma that inflicts on the child, that doesn’t go away,” Hardial said.