<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title></title>
		<description>Comments for 0 at http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:20:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Election?</title>
			<link>http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/20080422128051/local/news/harris-hill-defend-election-spending.html#comment-6117</link>
			<description>Good one, Nate!  Cullen says he &quot;doubts the uproar will be enough to spark an election&quot;.  Ummm, ya think?  That joke of a Liberal opposition has sat across from the government and railed on about everything from Afghanistan to the budget to immigration...and then proceeded to vote WITH Harper's Tories because they are scared S**Tless of going to the polls with their buffoon of a &quot;leader&quot;.  Cullen's NDP are no better, with two-faced Layton swinging back and forth like a Vegas tranny on a coke-fueled bender, more concerned with keeping seats in the next election than defending traditional NDP values.

If they are willing to cave on social issues they allegedly feel so vehemently opposed to...I hardly think that a few misappropriated election ad dollars will do the trick.   - tombstone81</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:02:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
