@pgcitizen

Wednesday June 19, 2013

subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!


    QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.



    Home »  News »  Business

    U.S. agency orders Enbridge to dredge Kalamazoo River two years after oil spill

    VANCOUVER - More than two and a half years after a Canadian pipeline rupture spilled heavy oil into a Michigan River, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is ordering Calgary-based Enbridge (TSX:ENB) to perform additional dredging to remove submerged oil.

    The agency said it has repeatedly found oil in sections of the Kalamazoo River.

    "The dredging required by EPA's order will prevent submerged oil from migrating to downstream areas where it will be more difficult or impossible to recover," the EPA said in a statement issued Thursday.

    The agency is also ordering Enbridge — proponent of the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline through northern British Columbia — to maintain sediment traps throughout the river to capture oil outside the dredge areas.

    The agency gave the company 15 days to provide a work plan, and said dredging should begin this spring.

    The July 2010 spill near Marshall, Michigan, has dogged the company as it proceeds through a federal review of the Northern Gateway to deliver oil sands products to a tanker port in Kitimat, B.C.

    The ability to clean-up diluted bitumen from Alberta's oil sands has been raised at the hearings by project opponents.

    The American environmental agency issued a searing report last year criticizing the company's spill response.

    A letter sent Thursday to Rich Adams, vice-president of operations for Enbridge's U.S. operations, from EPA co-ordinator Ralph H. Dollhopf, said the oil mixed with river sediment and organic matter had turned to sludge, "making it difficult to find and recover."

    EPA documents note that they met twice with company officials about the administrative order.

    "Enbridge's comments challenged the validity and interpretation of the data relied upon by U.S. EPA in making its determination ...," said a 36-page response.

    In it, the agency discounts Enbridge's suggestion that allowing the oil to biodegrade is the best option for dealing with the remaining oil.


    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Prince George Citizen welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN

    If you were a registered user with the princegeorgecitizen.com, prior to February 3, 2010, you will be required to re-register. We apologize for any inconvenience. Click here to register



    Lost your password?