@pgcitizen

Monday May 20, 2013

subscription options


Your Citizen,
Your Way




QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.



Game changer

The Citizen has been running a series of stories this week explaining the new Family Law Act in B.C.

On the surface, the new act seems like a common sense update of the Family Relations Act from 1979 but it's a game changer, both in letter and in spirit.

First, the spirit.

Even after the social upheaval of the 1960s and 1970s, the family structure hadn't changed all that much. The Family Relations Act of 1979 addressed issues that had always been present, such as children born out of wedlock. "Shacking up" may be have the new thing but the vast majority of couples (exclusively heterosexual under the law at the time) still got married before they bought a place and had some kids.

How things have changed.

According to the Justice Ministry, the number of common-law families in B.C. is growing at a rate three time faster than the number of married families. Getting married for religious reasons is almost unheard of in 2013 and social reasons for getting married (community acceptance, family pressure, rite of passage, government and legal recognition and so on) have mostly evaporated.

Put another way, love and commitment have become detached from the tradition of marriage. Other than buying matching rings, throwing a party (and getting gifts!) and heading off on a nice holiday, there seems little reason to have a wedding in modern times.

Furthermore, there have been a growing number of couples with blended families and no marriage to seal the deal, a rare sight seen when the Family Relations Act was drafted and the Brady Bunch was on TV - and, of course, Mike and Carol were married.

Unfortunately, this created a legal limbo that couples tumbled into after the thrill was gone. What happened to the kids, the house, the savings, the pension, the debt, and the coin collection? What about inheritances? Who about the dogs and the cabin on the lake? What about money brought into the relationship?

It fell to case law and legal precedents. If nothing could be worked out, matters got settled in court, where only the lawyers won and the outcome was unpredictable.

Now here's a law that treats those couples as if they really are married. It is an unprecedented recognition of the diversity of the modern family.

In black and white, the new Family Relations Act codifies many of those complicated issues for the first time. For example, the best interests of the child isn't just something one of numerous factors for a judge to consider, it's now the only factor when decisions are made involving the child, regardless of how that may inconvenience the parents.

Sure, there is an opt-out clause, allowing common law couples to make their own separate legal agreements regarding division of assets, but those agreements have to be fair and reasonable, as well as agreed to when both parties are of sound mind. Unless there are significant sums (in the black or in the red) involved, it's unlikely most couples will even bother, meaning the Family Law Act will dictate to couples how their affairs will be handled at the end of the relationship.

It also forces these adults to try to sort it out in mediation, rather than clogging up the courts with their dispute.

According to the Globe and Mail, about 160,000 B.C. couples got married Monday, whether they wanted or not.

A toast to the newlyweds and the thoughtful and modern act that now regulates them.


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Prince George Citizen welcomes your opinions and comments. Personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations are subject to reader complaint through flagging, and once alerted, online editors reserve the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We reserve the right to close the comments thread for stories that are deemed especially sensitive. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN

If you were a registered user with the princegeorgecitizen.com, prior to February 3, 2010, you will be required to re-register. We apologize for any inconvenience. Click here to register



Lost your password?