@pgcitizen

Saturday May 25, 2013

subscription options


Your Citizen,
Your Way




QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.



Where have the banks' bad assets gone?

I wish to draw your attention to the conflicting reports we are hearing about banks toxic assets.

On the one hand Ernst & Young reported over the Christmas period that " banks have billions more in toxic debt than they have admitted to " and at the same time we hear laudatory reports of banks balance sheets generally and specifically that the banks "have spent 2012 quietly shifting toxic assets and de-risking their balance sheets. "

Now, I suppose that both statements could be true but do not these reports beg the question as to whether these toxic asset " transfers " were carried out so "quietly "as to escape the notice of Ernst & Young and also the question as to the identity of the (philanthropic?) transferee.

United States senator Ron Paul came close a couple of years ago to accusing the Federal Reserve of buying up banks toxic debt, which accusation may have gained a tiny bit of credence when Bernanke reacted so strongly and refused to allow the audit of the Feds balance sheet as requested by Ron Paul. Both the European Central Bank and the Bank of England have announced similar plans to buy up " commercial paper " as was mooted by Bernanke at the time senator Ron Paul asked for an audit of the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.

One's mind boggles at the possible consequences of our discovering that central banks worldwide are in fact buying up these toxic assets It would certainly explain why, despite massive infusions of " quantitative easing " money, the banks are still not lending because, if my suspicions are correct, all the money is merely replacing rubbish assets and until the process is complete will not put the banks into lending mode.

But, and perhaps more importantly, if the central banks are in fact loading up with toxic assets where does that leave our financial system which has traditionally looked upon central banks as the custodians and guardians of our respective currencies, if in fact our currencies are backed by increasing amounts of worthless paper, all we will have done is to transfer these billions of losses from the banks to the taxpayer

Ronald C. Adair

Fort Fraser


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Prince George Citizen welcomes your opinions and comments. Personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations are subject to reader complaint through flagging, and once alerted, online editors reserve the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We reserve the right to close the comments thread for stories that are deemed especially sensitive. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN

If you were a registered user with the princegeorgecitizen.com, prior to February 3, 2010, you will be required to re-register. We apologize for any inconvenience. Click here to register



Lost your password?