@pgcitizen

Thursday May 23, 2013

subscription options


Your Citizen,
Your Way




QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.



No thank you to Enbridge pipeline

On November 1st, the Citizen ran one of those lovely Enbridge ads. You know the ones: fish jumping, birds frolicking on the breeze, green leaves floating by.

In it, Janet Holder, a VP at Enbridge who has recently moved back to Prince George to lead Enbridge’s efforts to sway the public in favor of the pipeline, shares some thoughts in a “spirit of honesty.”

Ms. Holder apparently takes us for simpletons.

First, she says how much she appreciates an open exchange of ideas. But if Enbridge were open to the ideas of, say, environmentalists, we wouldn’t even be having this conversation. They would be building more windmills rather than digging up one of the world’s dirtiest sources of oil and trying to ship it, through BC’s pristine wilderness, to some distant part of the planet.

And why are we trying to ship oil to our competitors in China anyway, when our friends in Eastern Canada have to import oil from overseas?

Then she points out that oil tankers have been plying the BC coast for decades, hoping, perhaps, that we won’t notice the key point about the increase in tanker traffic if the pipeline is built.

According to the BC government, tanker traffic out of Kitimat will increase from 60 tankers in 2010 to approximately 225 tankers if the pipeline is built. And given that every tanker trip increases the probability of an accident, and that Enbridge will be transporting diluted bitumen with high levels of heavy metals and sulphur, we can be quite confident that there will one day be a devastating spill on our coast.

Remember the Exxon Valdez?

Currently, tankers carrying oil from Alaska to the US observe a voluntary exclusion zone, keeping them out of BC’s coastal waters and inside passage. The proposed pipeline would have Ultra Large Crude Carriers, the world’s largest tankers with a capacity over three million barrels, steaming in and out of Kitimat. Tankers that massive are not even allowed in Vancouver, and they want to bring them through the narrow straits to Kitimat?

Since there is plenty of demand for oil in the US and Eastern Canada, the only reason to sell our oil to China would be to get a better price. So we should risk BC’s rivers and coasts so someone else profits and the gas price goes up? No thank you!

Stephen Rader

Prince George


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Prince George Citizen welcomes your opinions and comments. Personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations are subject to reader complaint through flagging, and once alerted, online editors reserve the right to delete comments deemed inappropriate. We reserve the right to close the comments thread for stories that are deemed especially sensitive. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertise | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN

If you were a registered user with the princegeorgecitizen.com, prior to February 3, 2010, you will be required to re-register. We apologize for any inconvenience. Click here to register



Lost your password?