Temp: 4°C
Feels like: 0°C
Humidity: 87%
TOP BANNER WEB
 
 

City remains "worst offender" on spending growth Print E-mail
Written by Citizen staff   
Thursday, 05 November 2009
IN STORY

Related Items

No related items found
Although it's improved slightly, the City of Prince George remains the "worst offender" for B.C. communities of its size when it comes to increases in municipal spending, says the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.
According to a CFIB study released Thursday, the city's spending rose at 2.89 times the rate at which inflation plus the growth the city's population climbed between 2000 and 2007, the highest among the province's municipalities with over 25,000 residents.
"Among the larger municipalities, Prince George is the worst offender when it comes to its spending increases over the past seven years or so, spending three times what population and inflation growth would suggest is reasonable," said said Laura Jones, one of the report's authors and CFIB's Western Canada vice-president.
However, she added the ratio has improved somewhat between 2006 and 2007, and markedly more so than all others.
"The bad news is that Prince George is the worst offender. The good news is that Prince George showed the most improvement," Jones continued. "Last year, when we did this report, Prince George was spending 3.6 times more than population and inflation growth.
"So there is a little bit of a silver lining."

Comments (3)add
...
written by 49er , November 05, 2009 (07:14:18 PM)
Is anybody really surprised?
Where the heck does this council think the money is going to come from to pay for all their extravagence? The forest industry is in the tank, and it'll be there for awhile. All we now is for one of the big mills to close, indefinitly.
And these guys down at city all just keep handing out the cash.
STOP spending now! Put a freeze on all capital spending And that wish list? Put it in the paper shreader.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
...
written by travhops2 , November 06, 2009 (04:55:40 AM)
To see it in black and white is very disturbing. Yet they're handing out high paying jobs, not cutting. Do we really need someone to point out idling hot spots, a communications manager? What will a $100,000 a year person bring into the city as far as revenue? Maybe what they needed to hire is an efficiency expert?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
;)
written by venus , November 06, 2009 (09:35:03 AM)
come on Travhops2 dont give them more ideas...you should say we can TRADE both new jobs for an effiency expert......
hahaha this town cracks me up
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 05 November 2009 )
 
 
00647122


Who's Online

We have 161 guests and 14 members online