Temp: 5°C
Feels like: 1°C
Humidity: 81%
WR Ventures
 
 

Petition calls for formal dog parks Print E-mail
Written by Citizen staff   
Tuesday, 03 November 2009
00670000

Related Items

A 1,200-name petition calling for formal designation of a off-leash dog parks was presented to city council on Monday night.
Speaking on behalf of those who signed, Annie Booth told council dogs are commonly off-leash at Ginter's Field and Moore's Meadow but they're mixed-use parks and conflicts are increasing.
She said the areas should be confirmed as "true dog parks in which the primary use is actually off-leash exercise."
"It's our feeling that it's impossible to keep the other user groups out but they should come in with the understanding that these are true dog parks and they will encounter off-leash dogs and should be prepared to respond accordingly," Booth added.
Supporters also want better services and safety features like gates, fencing, signs and more garbage containers and establishment of new dog parks elsewhere to meet the needs of the variety of owners and their dogs.
"For example, senior citizen dog owners are very attached to Williston Park because it's accessible, it's flat, it's easy for senior citizens to use and get their dogs exercised, but currently it's not an off-leash area, they are being ticketed by bylaw services," Booth said.
Council expressed some initial comments of support before referring the item to staff for comment, although Coun. Cameron Stolz warned that fenced areas come at a cost.
"The challenge from our perspective of the city is that we have no money to do that," he said. "We are quite strapped financially as we have discussed many times, so perhaps we do this in a partnership."
Comments (9)add
...
written by bcracer , November 03, 2009 (04:13:11 PM)
This is nice...but you "CHOSE" to get a dog...are you prepared to pay for this area or at least the use of it or do you expect the taxpayer to pay for your dog's play field?...I choose not to help you pay for it!

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -8
...
written by dogwalker , November 03, 2009 (05:11:00 PM)
The current leash only parks do have those amenities, and many people do not use them..I get to dodge many many piles along the paths of Cottonwood Park for example, where bags and garbages are provided, and signage is clearly visible within the park.

I would support and off leash park too, but not completely at the City's expense. PG is going to have to already rebound from irresponsible purchases made by the City already. If the organizers of the petition and movement want to begin fundraising efforts, I for one would support it wholeheartedly.

Also, just my humble opinion, but there's no reason Moore's Meadow cannot be used as an off leash park. The meadow is a great place for dogs to run..I admit I do not leash my dogs when I go there. ( Keep in mind my dogs are not intimidating, and they obey commands to come when called etc.) The one proposed in the letter should also be considered for seniors etc with limited mobility..just not at our cost at this time. And you can thank Mayor and Council for that.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Quool , November 03, 2009 (09:28:26 PM)
Moore's Meadow is bear habitat and therefore all pets should be leashed in that area.

An off-leash park is already proposed for the old Duchess Park area.

:http://www.city.pg.bc.ca/pages/news/2009/duchess_staff_report.pdf

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
I suspect Mary Fallis would turn over in her grave ....
written by JoG , November 03, 2009 (10:28:32 PM)
... if she knew that Moore's Meadow was being used as an off-leash park and proposed to be formalized even further for that use.

Moore's Meadow is first and foremost a wilderness park in this city and a very unique one at that as Mary often had to remind Council of when it was in danger of being compromised.

Quool is bang on!

As far as BCRacer goes, he is continuing to show his colours loud and clear.

There are many people in this city who CHOOSE to play soccer, ride in bike lanes, play tennis, play lacrosse, lawn bowl, use the skaterboard park, play softball, walk the track at Masich Stadium, etc. etc, without paying for it.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Sorry, Mary..whoever you are lol
written by dogwalker , November 03, 2009 (11:13:43 PM)
Actually, as I stated above, my dogs are both very well trained. I have seen bears in the park and other wildlife, I call my dogs and they come, and they don't go far enough away that they cannot hear me. They do not chase the bears. We avoid them and respect the habitat of all creatures that live there. If they were not dogs that obeyed commands, they would be leashed. I also pick up after my dogs, leashed or not, which is more than I can say for about 75% of the people I see out there with their dogs.

It's called common sense.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
the key phrase is ......
written by JoG , November 04, 2009 (12:07:35 AM)
....... "which is more than I can say for about 75% of the people I see out there with their dogs."

When designating something for a use, one has to assume that some people will misuse the area. 10% might be acceptable. 75% is certainly not.

Sorry. I forgot to link to a site that explains a little bit about who Mary Fallis was.
http://www.northbceh.com/prince_george/parks/moores.htm

One of the trails in Moores Meadow is named after her.

http://library.unbc.ca/UNBCArchives/archDisplay/fondMain.aspx?id=21&str=Mary Fallis fonds






report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by dogwalker , November 04, 2009 (01:32:21 AM)
Well I guess we have differing opinions then. I was actually being quite accurate based on my own observations..obviously what you see is much different than I when you are out and about and that's fine.

I do agree with you here though, Jo..those of us that enjoy the parks, etc. that our city has to offer (and we do pay for many of those amenities through our taxes), we need to be thankful to the pioneers who made it possible for us to enjoy them. We also need to be respectful of one another and protect the longetivity of these assets.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by MustBMe , November 04, 2009 (09:37:50 AM)
There's lots of leash-free zones around, but the catch is, they are out of the city limits. The majority of people who I see walking dogs look perfectly able to get in a car and drive outside city limits to take thier animals for walks. But I guess it's just more "civilized" to do it in a city environment. My advice is move to Vancouver if you want taxpayer funded dog parks. I have absolutely nothing against dogs or people who own them, but I definately have a problem with anyone who thinks the average taxpayer should pay for thier pets exercise because they are too scared to get away from the city lights to exercise their pooch.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
...
written by travhops2 , November 04, 2009 (02:54:23 PM)
I have a dog and would not go to a leash free park. I'm afraid of unleashed dogs and have had many close calls for myself and my dog. If others want to utilize them I have no problem with that but personally feel the risks are too high. My leash free zone is a fenced back yard.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 03 November 2009 )
 
 
Live Free


Who's Online

We have 156 guests and 10 members online