Written by MARK NIELSEN Citizen staff
|
|
Thursday, 01 January 2009 |
A possible strike at B.C. ports has prompted Initiatives Prince George to urge the federal government to step in and prevent a disruption. "We are extremely concerned that a labour disruption could result in the long-term loss of hard-won trade through Canadian West Coast ports - particularly at the Port of Prince Rupert -- which may never be recovered," IPG president Tim McEwan said in a letter to Labour Minister Rona Ambrose, drafted Wednesday. "This could have significant impacts on Prince Georges and northern British Columbias recent economic diversification and growth efforts which are now beginning to show positive results. These gains are tenuous, and new industry confidence in this corridor must be preserved," McEwan wrote. Despite several months of negotiations, about 450 ship and dock foremen, members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), Local 514, remain at loggerheads with the B.C. Marine Employers Association. The ILWU is in a strike position as of today but the sides will be meeting Saturday morning with two federally-appointed mediators to see if an agreement can be reached. However, they're said to be far apart on a number of issues, which reportedly include pension payments and working conditions. If they do strike, about 5,000 other port workers are expected to walk off the job to support them, including those working in Prince Rupert. And if there is a strike, only grain shipments would be guaranteed because they are protected by federal law. Specialty crops that move by containers are not covered by the law. In the past, striking workers have been legislated back to work. However, with Canada's Parliament temporarily suspended, this type of legislation cannot be passed until at least Jan. 27, when Parliament is scheduled to resume. "That obviously creates an issue," McEwan said in an interview. But he said there are other options such getting an arbitrator to choose between the two final offers. "Most of the cards will be on the table shortly," he said. "It's too critical a piece of public infrastructure for it to be down for any length of time because of the ripple effects it has for the northern, provincial and national economy."
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 01 January 2009 )
|
written by White Eyes , January 01, 2009 (08:35:25 AM)
I always wonder what it would be like to negoiate with a gun to your head, and so many innocent people depending on you.
Does anyone know what it is that Canada is being held ramson for? Is it just something like a strike for a dozen new finger nail dryers for the secretaries, or is it money, and how much? Why the secrecy? Is it embarassing? Lets see the beef.