Search | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Temp: -12°C
Feels like: -17°C
Humidity: 82%
SPORTS BANNER  
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
 
Rogers makes no promises on sawmill's tax cut request
Jan 07, 16:15 (Hits: 168) -- Comments: (6)
 

My Account

START LEARNING

Photo Archive

 

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander
Print E-mail
Written by Citizen staff   
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
The word "bailout" has been on repeated so often in 2008 that dictionary publisher Merriam-Webster named it Word of the Year.
The U.S. financial industry led the charge for government rescue packages. Now North American automakers want their piece of the pie to tide them over until the economic crisis abates.
The Canadian government is mulling over bailout requests from domestic carmakers in Ontario and the aerospace industry in Quebec.
This has prompted the B.C. government to remind Ottawa there are other vital industries being crippled these days -- like forestry, as a not so subtle example.
The B.C. Liberals, claiming government bailouts for companies go against their grain, aren't asking for a bailout for forestry, but you have to wonder if they wouldn't say OK if Ottawa offered one.
But Victoria's position, flexible or not, was pretty well sealed when the Forest Products Association of Canada told Ottawa last week not to bail out forest companies because it would only extend the downturn and would not help the industry's competitiveness in the long run.
Said forest products association chief Avrim Lazar: "Our basic view is that government has to know what its role is and the government's role is not hands off but it's not bailouts -- it is looking at every piece of government policy that effects our competitiveness and trying to create world-class competitiveness conditions."
Ditto, said the B.C. government.
Premier Gordon Campbell told Prime Minister Stephen Harper to think of everyone affected by the economic turmoil, not just those in the automotive and aerospace sectors.
Lazar pointed out that forestry employs more Canadians than the auto and aerospace industries combined -- and his concern that politics is at play when the PM ponders aid for auto and aerospace, centred in Ontario and Quebec, is bang on.
Speaking Tuesday, Campbell didn't say forestry should receive a bailout, but he didn't say it shouldn't, either. He simply called on Harper to be fair across the country.
It's important Harper listens. As Forests Minister Pat Bell said Tuesday, forest companies could use Ottawa's help making inroads in China as well as in research and development.
There is also a bulging Employment Insurance surplus said to be worth $56 billion that could be tapped to help laid-off workers.
It might be politically expedient for the federal Tories to come to the rescue of key manufacturers in vote-rich Ontario and Quebec, but it would be myopic and inexcusable if other industries, their workers and their communities were not given equal treatment -- in one form or another.
Comments (3)add
...
written by Pylot Project , November 27, 2008 (07:29:25 AM)
Doing my best Billy Crystal.... "I'd like to partake in your bail-out pieee.."

This is a tough decision. Bail them out and the tax payer foots the bill. Let the auto and aerospace industries rot in their own filth, and the tax payer foots the bill with social assistance.

I found it interesting that there is pressure on the CAW to allow the big three to cut wages of the floor workers. But they only represent 7% of the annual costs of the companies. I suspect the big wigs don't want their wages cut. As one politician so eloquently stated "I'm entitled to my entitlements".
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by unclesammy , November 27, 2008 (07:45:18 AM)
I can't believe we're considering bailing out a PRIVATE company. The public has no interest in these companies except for those who are, or were, employed. Even then, the companies have made poor business decisions to put them where they are.

Canada is going to be cutting social programming, and selling public owned assets, but somehow we have the money to give to these private businesses? And what do we get in return for this? Once again the wealth imbalance from lower and middle-class shifts to the upper-class. Yeah *sarcasm*
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
bailout
written by needtono , November 28, 2008 (06:06:19 PM)
bail out the same @##$//4$ that are charging us crazy prices for crappy autos. why should we pay them to build crappy autos then turnaround and pay crazy prices for said crappy auto that they will build with our money
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 26 November 2008 )
 
 
BK TWO WAY


Who's Online

We have 89 guests and 4 members online