Search | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Temp: -8°C
Feels like: -14°C
Humidity: 91%
NEWS BANNER  
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
 
Advice for safe shoveling
Jan 07, 14:24 (Hits: 14) -- Comments: (0)
 

Judge reserves decision in manslaughter case Print E-mail
Written by Citizen staff   
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
After hearing submissions from all four defence lawyers, Mr. Justice Eric Chamberlist reserved his decision Wednesday in the sentencing of four men who have pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the death of a Dawson Creek man two years ago.
He will deliver his sentencing decision in B.C. Supreme Court in Prince George on Nov. 28 at 2 p.m. for Kyle Benjamin Abel, 25; Chrisopher Anthony Beaulieu, 29; Darcy Paul Beaulieu, 23; and Sheldon Bradley Ghostkeeper, 29.
Charges stem from the killing of Thomas Willcocks, 28, on Dec. 2, 2006, whose remains were found in a burned-out van in Dawson Creek.
The incident from which charges arose from a dispute with Willcocks in a motel room about the drug trade.
"It was a beating gone bad," said Rob Climie, defence counsel for Chris Beaulieu. It was not what judges refer to as a 'near murder', the defence lawyer said -- that is, the kind of manslaughter that comes close to murder in terms of prior planning and clear intention beforehand to cause bodily harm in reckless disregard about the likelihood of death, the defence lawyer said.
"He (Chris Beaulieu) was a follower rather than the initiator," Climie said. "He was highly intoxicated."
Abel tried CPR for 15 minutes on the deceased, Justice Chamberlist interposed.
Climie called for a sentence for Chris Beaulieu of three to four years of new time in prison, in addition to 37 months derived from double credit for eighteen-and-a-half months of time served in remand.
"Darcy Beaulieu didn't intend to kill the deceased," said Keith Aartsen, his lawyer.
"It was not the intent to murder him or cause irreparable bodily harm to the deceased," Aartsen said. "That is what did in fact happen, but it was just a situation where it (beating) just got out of hand."
There is no evidence that Darcy Beaulieu encouraged, directed or came up with the idea of how Willcocks's body was eventually disposed of, the defence lawyer said. "He did not commit the atrocity on the body of the deceased," Aartsen said
He called for a sentence "in the four- to six-year range" for Darcy Beaulieu.
"A near murder attracts longer sentences," he said. "This is not a near murder, so four to six years is standard."
Don Kennedy, lawyer for Ghostkeeper, agreed a four- to six-year sentence would be appropriate for his client, with credit more than 25 months in custody prior to disposition of the case.
Ghostkeeper is a hard worker, Kennedy said. He has had extended periods of employment in firefighting, and in the area of forestry he has been a bucker and a faller as well as doing spacing work.
In his childhood he was a victim of physical abuse, and learned at an early age he had to fend for himself, Kennedy said. "He was involved in violence on the street to survive."
Addressing the court about the case in general, Kennedy said a beating death is serious but such an incident, if there are few aggravating factors, does not ordinarily draw continued public attention. However, the manner of disposal of the body in this case prompted disgust and a public outcry, the defence lawyer said.
"The cutting up of the body with a power saw and all those kinds of things -- that's where the public outrage comes from and it all comes from a stupid, pathetic attempt to hide the identity of the body," Kennedy said. "This was egregious post-offence conduct."
-------

Comments (15)add
Crazy System we have
written by robterio , November 19, 2008 (10:30:41 AM)
Wow. 4-6 years for 4 guys killing another guy. Even though he was involved in the drug trade, getting killed and having your body cut up with a power saw (I guess experience as a Bucker and a faller amy have paid off)then burned would seem that someone has no respect for their fellow man. If it's true that one of the guys has already commited manslaughter before, then when does it become apparent that there may be no rehabilitating some people. We sure seem to be getting soft of these kinds of people. I quess it will stay that way until we get fed up with this stuff happening.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
This is sick!
written by nurse , November 19, 2008 (10:42:29 AM)
I am the deceased sister-in-law and I find it absolutely disgusting that it is okay for these four individuals to break into someones hotel, beat him to death, kidnap him, have somebody else dismember him, and then burn his body. How is it that someone can do this to another individual and only get 4-6 years? They can blame it on their dysfuctional childhood all they want, but what no one knows is the life that Thomas had before his MURDER!! Thomas came into this world fighting, fought his entire life to survive and left this world fighting. But no one is going to hear Thomas's story because he is dead. And now his children are left to deal with the fact that their daddy is in heaven, all because of the work of four, oops I mean 5, guys.
I wish I could say that these guys are going to get what they deserve, but I can't because we all know how our judicial system sucks!!! I think that an eye for an eye would be great in this circumstance, but unfortunately it is not going to happen. It sickens me! My heart aches for the loss of my brother-in-law, the father of my neice and nephews, the finance of my little sister, and the friend to many.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +9
Here some more!
written by nurse , November 19, 2008 (10:49:55 AM)
As a nurse working in detox, I know first hand that trying to rehabilitate these guys is not worth the taxpayers money. I have attempted to detox many people from many different substances and it doesn't work. I see many of the same people over and over again. The system can not change people, the person has to want to change themselves.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
...
written by travhops , November 19, 2008 (11:15:19 AM)
Yeah, I really want to see these guys back on the street! When does the justice system start to protect society and punish guilty parties?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
Justice
written by Claymor , November 19, 2008 (11:17:44 AM)
It's the defence lawyer's job to argue these issues, and up to the judge to decide. Sentencing is a difficult challenge, but will hopefully go hard on this bunch of goons, and harder on some than others.

With all respect and sympathy to 'nurse' and the family however, this incident was a predictable outcome of the victim's involvement in the drug trade. It's most unlikely that he worried too much about the effect his trafficing was having on other victims and their families. Horrific as his end was, there need be no tears for dead pushers.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -3
No need for tears?!!!
written by nurse , November 19, 2008 (11:32:19 AM)
Who the hell are you to try and tell me that because Thomas dealt drugs, as well as used, I have no need to cry over him. You did not know Thomas, nor will you ever. It does not matter the trade that he got involved in, he was still a human being and did not deserve to be killed. If we have no reason to cry over him, then you come and explain that to his three children. His children are devestated, just like the rest of us are. We can cry all we want and will continue to do so. Thomas was a beautiful person inside and out, yeah he had some faults, but who doesn't. He didn't deserve to die.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
Well then ..
written by Claymor , November 19, 2008 (11:48:12 AM)
Nurse, as I said, I have every sympathy for those left behind, but you are making the same arguments to get sympathy for the deceased as the defence lawyer is making to get sympathy for the murderers. Drugs are a scourge and a deadly business for everyone involved. If the deceased was not prepared to accept the consequences, including those for his family, he ought to have chosen other behaviors. Go and grieve, preferably in private. You have my sympathy, but do not expect those who detest the drug industry to have hypocritical sympathy for its willing perpetrators.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by nurse , November 19, 2008 (12:03:26 PM)
I am not denying that Thomas could have chosen another life path, but if you knew what his childhood was like you would have a different opinion. Thomas was not given a good start in life and did the best he could with what he had. Yes, he was involved in drugs, and no I do not agree with it, but I can't help the feelings I have. I can grieve any way that I want and if I find it helpful to scream at the world, especially the four accused, then I will.
I am not saying that I like the drug industry, I completely, 100% detest it, but once someone you know is murdered because of this trade, your detest for the industry just increases as your feelings for the person (Thomas) involved remain unchanged. We all loved Thomas, and will continue to love him as we watch his children grow.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
RIP
written by Claymor , November 19, 2008 (12:17:10 PM)
As long as everyone recognizes that the same sentiments are rightly or wrongly being applied to the four murderers, who also apparently did not have a good start, then rest in peace and good luck to the survivors in this situation. The drug trade exists because society tolerates it, so everyone needs to be vigilant in characterizing it for what it is.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
RIP
written by dealingwithit , November 19, 2008 (12:44:55 PM)
This is the father of my children, you are talking about, and I would appreciate if you left your nasty comments to yourself. Thomas was a great man, he was a hardworker on the oil rigs, last job in TumblerRidge when he lost his job he had nowhere to go, so he travelled down to dawson creek, where he was staying at a motel with our dog. He was only a drug dealer for a couple of months before he was killed. He is the type of person that would have never hurt a fly intentionally but this was a way to make money, he got caught up with the wrong crowd of people, and tried leaving that crowd to be with a better one, he switched sides and this is what he got for doing that. It had nothing to do with the fact he sold drugs, the people that killed him were the suppliers of the drugs that he was selling. So switching sides pissed these guys off to where they beat him to death, and my sister "nurse" is right, we should and can grieve any way we want, if I am not supposed to feel sad that he was MURDERED then why did and do i have enough tears I could cry a river? Oh thats right I have a heart..yes eventually it would have kicked him in the ass, for selling drugs, but I would have rather seen him spend time in jail for selling misery to people then being murdered...he didnt deserve to die, no matter which way you look at it, I talked to him 2 days before it happened, and he never once mentioned he was in trouble but he knew he was..and why?? he was protecting his family who was always his number one priority. He told me he wanted to come home, start a new life, be home for Christmas he wanted his family. But instead he got to come home with pieces missing, and end up having a memorial service for him. That wasnt the christmas present I wanted. But thanks for trying to make it sound like he was terrible and that he was in this for years on end. He was an amazing human being, a friend, lover, husband, father, brother...and many will miss him for the rest of their lives. Please tell me how I am supposed to feel safe with these jerks getting out in maybe 2 years time, walking the streets my kids grow up on?? Am I supposed to run away to the states cause I know they cant cross the border?? Is that the only place my children and I are going to feel safe??
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by Reality , November 19, 2008 (12:53:02 PM)
I have read so many posts referring to similar cases such as this, where a person involved in the drug / gang scene ends up murdered because of their involvement. People now just shrug their shoulders and say “oh well, they asked for it” or “they had it coming”, or other similar sentiments.

While someone may have made some very wrong choices in their life and perhaps ended up down the wrong path, they do not deserve to be murdered. To have the attitude that “they asked for it” or “it is all part of the trade” seems to give the message that it is ok for these rat bastards take over and kill our loved ones. Whether one is involved in the drug trade, or just in the wrong place at the wrong time within the drug world, there is nothing that makes killing ok. These people are MURDERING people and need to pay the price for that.

The attitude held by so many people seems to be so hypocritical that it just sickens me. If a drug dealer murdered an innocent bystander, then all hell would break loose, but because someone who lived the life was murdered, it is ok?

No one is denying that the deceased had issues and was certainly involved in something he shouldn't have been. The fact remains, though, that he was MURDERED and that that crime “MURDER” is a serious crime and needs to be taken seriously. Taking the “oh well” attitude is not only irresponsible, but incredibly disrespectful to the deceased’s family.

Let’s see… we all know women really shouldn’t walk around alone at night, shouldn’t walk around alone at night in bad areas, and shouldn’t walk around alone at night wearing next to nothing because trouble can come knocking. So, a woman goes for a walk, dressed in next to nothing, in a really bad area and ends up being raped and beaten and tortured. Do we say “oh well”? Well, maybe some jerkoffs do, but the fact is that it is WRONG. Rape, torture, beating is wrong wrong wrong wrong and it is not ok just because a woman was out doing something she shouldn’t have been doing or was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

So, tell me what the difference is here?

I have a very hard time hearing it reported that this was a "beating gone wrong" yet it went so far as to include power saws. The article calls this a pathetic attempt at concealing the identity of a body. I have a realy problem with this - what kind of person, who never intended to kill anyone or permanently damage then, can then take a power saw and hack a person up? Seriously - this is a joke, right? It's quite a leap to go from a beating gone wrong to dismemberment.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
Unbelievable!
written by pgellie , November 19, 2008 (12:54:45 PM)
I am sorry for you loss, NOBODY deserves this kind of misery.
I realize it's vital for the defense lawyer to make clients look good, but how do they face themselves in the mirror every day?
4-6 years, our judicial sytem is a joke. I am sickened and embarassed at the sentences being handed down to murderers and such time and time again.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
Web seriously need a justice adjustment in Canada
written by robterio , November 19, 2008 (01:31:16 PM)
It was only a few weeks ago that the Chief Justice for BC had an article in this paper where he stated that the penalties handed down in our courts are appropriate for the types of crimes being committed and that the PG courts are in line with the rest of the province. That would seem to be where the problem is stemming from, and that is people are prepared to accept the punishments as defined by the courts rather than the courts doing what the citezenry should be demanding. There are those that will tell you that a system that is not based on rehabilitation causes more problems than it cures. While I generally agree, I think there comes a time when we all know there are those that just don't care, nor is it likely they ever will care of the effects their actions have on others. When a person gets to this point, there has to be better ways of dealing with them to keep them off the streets. 3rd strike laws and dangerous offender status are just two of the systems that are in place here and the US. It just seems that most dangerous offender status seem to be given for sex crimes. Victim groups need to get better organized and elect more guys like Chuck Cadman (whose son was killed)federally and provincially. The problem with most of our politicians is that they never have personal experience with these kinds of issues and therefore these issues have a lower priority than say the economy.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by nurse , November 19, 2008 (01:32:55 PM)
We as the family are having a real hard time comprehending the alleged "beating gone wrong!" If this truly was a beating gone wrong, Thomas's face and hands would not have been cut off and thrown out the window of a moving van. This is a poor excuse!!
I have expressed numerous of times that Thomas had a rough life; however the only people that know about Thomas’s childhood are the people that had an active part in his life. We keep hearing from the defense that the accused had rough childhoods, but I don’t care. Am I supposed to feel sorry for them? NO!! Was there no time in the accused childhood, that they heard that murder was wrong? I guess that message went on deaf ears because an individual only needs morals to understand that one.
The accused families keep saying that they want to get on with their lives…well good for them! So glad it’s easy for them. While we are continually explaining to three children why their daddy is not around, the accused families can continue having their Sunday family suppers. We will never be able to have another conversation with Thomas, or see his face, his smile, see him playing with his children, or hear his laugh again. At least the accused families can have that. Do I have sympathy for the accused families….absolutely not. Try being on the other side!!
It angers me to know that the accused are going to walk away in a couple of years after stealing another human’s life….what by accident? Give me a break! A person can perform all the CPR that they want on somebody, but ultimately it needs to be handed over to the paramedics. So why weren’t they called? Oh wait they were drunk and high! But Kyle had enough sense to initiate CPR (or so he says), but lacked the better judgment to call 911. Pathetic excuse! I have performed CPR numerous of times, and no it’s not fun. But I always make sure that someone with more experience…ummm a doctor….is notified so they can help out and do their part.
It has taken a lot of courage and strength for my sister to comment, so I would appreciate if people take that into consideration and leave her alone. If you have something negative to say, express it to me. She is dealing with enough and does not need to hear people’s critical comments.
I do, however, appreciate the last couple of comments from pgellie and reality.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
Again.
written by Claymor , November 19, 2008 (06:04:52 PM)
One, nurse don't make yourself crazy trying to make sense of the event. The viscious savagery of the drug world defies comprehension unless you're involved in it.

Two, nobody is saying that murder/manslaughter is okay. That's why the four accused stand convicted and will go to prison. The only issue is for how long.

Three, if events had turned out differently, and the deceased was the murderer, or if the deceased was convicted for trafficking, his supporters and the defence lawyer would be making exactly the same arguments to minimize his sentence as we are hearing for these four accused. His tough beginning is no more or less significant than the others.

Four, there is a tremendous difference between murder of an innocent bystander and murder of one who is willingly involved in a criminal enterprise where murder is a management technique. Traffickers know the risks and ought not to be memorialized for the predictable consequences of their choices.

Five, I am still waiting to hear how much compassion the deceased had for the victims of the drugs he traded, including the addicts, those who cared about the addicts, those who were robbed or otherwise brutalized by the addicts, etc. Regardless of the deceased's prior life or character, there is nothing defensible about trafficking drugs.

Six, beware what you hope for. There are several civilizations in the world who are older than Canada's, that execute drug traffickers and murderers alike. I'm not sure we want to go there, but it's the neat answer to the double standard we are seeing in this discussion.

Seven, if the family is prepared to go public with their grief, they must be prepared to endure the inevitable scrutiny. Better this should end here that he may rest in peace.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 19 November 2008 )
 
 
BK TWO WAY


Who's Online

We have 196 guests and 8 members online