Search | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Temp: -8°C
Feels like: -14°C
Humidity: 91%
BANNER AD  
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
 
Advice for safe shoveling
Jan 07, 14:24 (Hits: 22) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

START LEARNING

Photo Archive

 

Mr. Rogers Print E-mail
Written by Citizen staff   
Thursday, 13 November 2008
There will be a new face in the mayor's chair for the first time in 12 years and it comes at a pivotal time in Prince George's history.
The city has clearly not been immune to negative economic factors that are buffeting the globe, but it's evident Prince George is in a much better position to weather the storm than it was 25 years ago. It's a sign of the city's maturity and its development of a stronger economic foundation that is less affected by the volatility of forestry.
That said, the next three years in Prince George will be extremely challenging -- and no less so than for the next mayor and eight city councillors.
Voters are fortunate to have two capable, experienced candidates seeking the mayor's office -- Dan Rogers and Don Zurowski.
Both have deservedly been top vote-getters in the last several elections and have been unquestioned leaders on city council.
We would be comfortable with either person as mayor but, like voters, a choice has to be made and our choice is Rogers.
Three years ago Rogers left council to challenge Mayor Colin Kinsley but lost a tight race. He's used his three years out of office wisely by developing a better grasp of where he stands on the issues. He's become a more forceful, articulate candidate with a well thought out vision for the city and its major challenges. We like his idea of linking taxes to the rise in the cost of living, and talk of a debt-reduction strategy. Community involvement in setting budget priorities also makes sense.
Zurowski ran a strong campaign and definitely has the intelligence and background to be an effective mayor, but we see in Zurowski a similarity to the 2005 Rogers. Zurowski wasn't as polished or articulate in the campaign as he could have been and tended to rely on an impressive assortment of facts to make his points, rather than offering clear ideas or direction. Leadership is about taking a stand, and often Zurowski seemed to be reluctant to offend one side or another on an issue.
If he doesn't win, we'd like to see Zurowski run again in three years, particularly if Rogers falters.
With the economic challenges facing Prince George, the mayor and council will be expected to take bold stands and run the city as the business it is.
There will be at least two new faces on city council because of vacancies created by Zurowski and Sherry Sethen, who is stepping down after two terms.
Incumbents Murry Krause, Debora Munoz and Brian Skakun should be returned. A longtime social conscience on council, Krause will be particularly effective in forwarding a Housing First strategy for getting the city's homeless off the streets and into a stable environment.
Both Skakun and Munoz have had their moments, both good and bad, but they've certainly gone against the flow on a handful of issues and were sometimes right in doing so. Their experience combined with their critical thinking on many issues make them good choices.
Garth Frizzell leads an impressive group of top-tier challengers. He has a strong grasp of the issues thanks to his extensive participation on a long list of committees and his experience as president of the Chamber of Commerce. Plus, he's a downtown business owner and he's young -- a quality that's missing in the current long-in-the-tooth group.
Shari Green is another downtown business owner and is unabashed about her concern for that part of town. The state of downtown is an important issue and perhaps with Green being on council it would be dealt with that much more quickly. She doesn't seem to be the type who will linger once that item has been addressed to her satisfaction.
As a lawyer, Dave Wilbur would be helpful in guiding council through legal tangles. (Wouldn't he have been useful during the Hockey Enforcers controversy?) Just as important, Wilbur's involvement with the Prince George Airport Authority means he knows plenty about effectively lobbying higher levels of government. He comes across as low-key but his substance makes up for it. Would make a good representative on the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
MaryAnne Arcand's rating dropped from "definitely" to "on the bubble" after she failed to answer a questionnaire from the People's Action Committee on Healthy Air. But to that point she seemed to have both the track record and the drive to deliver on the items that matter most to voters and should get the benefit of the doubt.
Cameron Stolz was a virtual unknown but performed strongly at candidate forums and this straight-talker sounds willing to take a good, hard look at city spending. He's shown backbone and his business experience would be an asset.
City council has needed an injection of new blood for some time and we believe this group represents a strong blend of experience, promise and a fresh approach to conducting city affairs.
Comments (10)add
Well written
written by Shawn Petriw , November 14, 2008 (10:50:23 AM)
Whether one agrees with these endorsements or not, it's nice to see the Citizen finally make endorsements, especially ones that are so well articulated.

I applaud the editorial board or their efforts.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Reality , November 14, 2008 (02:49:51 PM)
But... I thought our newspaper was supposed to be unbiased?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
...
written by lamby , November 14, 2008 (05:13:24 PM)
I'm not so sure that being polished is an ideal quality in a candidate. Certainly we want somebody with knowledge and experience who knows the issues, but it seems to me that being overly polished can cause a candidate to lose touch with common human values. I hope that whoever wins tomorrow will remember the electorate and not become so polished and political that they forget who put them in office.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by White Eyes , November 14, 2008 (05:32:55 PM)
Hey, I was right! Media types stick together. It's all about looks. It's a career thing.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Well thought out
written by sharing , November 14, 2008 (06:35:41 PM)
This is a very important election. This would be a different City today had Dan Rogers won last time. So I am glad the Citizen took a stand.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Media is supposed to be unbiased!
written by grassick , November 15, 2008 (02:30:56 AM)
Not just my opinion but the opinion and standards of most media professors, students and journalists. Stating in such an article who they support opens up a whole new can of worms and not everyone has the advantage of having such a wide audience. To be considered unbiased then one has be unbiased.
It may be informative but so would be simply stating the positions of each candidates in a journalistic assessment of some or all of the candidates.
And further, if the city of Prince George is to be run as a business then it should change its name from the city of Prince George to Prince George Corporation or PG Inc.
The recent politicalization of the Citizen Staff's editorials are not just strictly put into municipal politics as they attest, ie. the nov. 12 editorial and their cheap shots at Layton and May. "No easy way of saying.....but Layton and May be damned."
Is this the new Citizen to be expected, greasing up the public for what will surely be a bitter May BC Provincial election which will be unbiased coverage of the candidates?
They have definitely lost a notch of respectability and integrity in my books for this one, and the last one. Hopefully there is no more to come.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Unbiased in news, NOT opinion
written by Shawn Petriw , November 15, 2008 (10:24:19 PM)
Editorials and columns are SUPPOSED to be biased. This was not a news article. It was an editorial, very definitely separated from the "news," as it should be.

Read my whole argument - about this editorial endorsement and Bruce Strachan's column endorsement here:

http://thepulse.ca/node/1589

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Rod Bear , November 16, 2008 (06:41:53 AM)
Well it worked didn't it? Everyone they wanted got in but Maryanne Arcand. This was endorsed by the citizen staff and not just one reporter or member. So, if things don't go well and the citizens of P.G. are disappointed in the group, we'll always remember who gave them the biggest leg up.

I wish them all the best, I expect to see a big change in the downtown very shortly because there's so many advocates on council now. I expect curbside recycling very shortly and also the air quality will improve. I hope they also encourage big business to shore up the failing economy from the mill closures and the ripple effect that causes with the support industries.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by bummer , November 19, 2008 (06:30:36 PM)
I did not want to live in Mr. Rogers’ neighbourhood. Therefore, I did not vote for him.
Did the paper’s editorials and columns sway voters? Absolutely, and here is how I got there: Just look back to the previous election. Prince George voters opted for the status quo and re-elected every incumbent council member despite a good blend of available candidates. The reason may be in the recent revelation that Prince George ranks below average in the smart cities survey.
Did the editors and columnists with their opinions do the voters a favour this time around? I don’t think so – but that is my bias.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by MustBMe , November 19, 2008 (08:08:16 PM)
Are we so sheepish that we would be influenced to vote a certain way just because the local paper appears to favour one candidate over another? I dont think so. I have seen numerous posts here trashing the Citizen and its writers on thier articles, so why would they now take the side of the newspapers choice? Never heard of the smart cities survey, but it sounds ridiculous if it exists. No matter what you think Bummer, we still have a brain and can use our own judgement when it comes to picking mayors.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 13 November 2008 )
 
 
ROAD TO THE ROAR


Who's Online

We have 185 guests and 9 members online