Search | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Friday, December 5, 2008
Temp: -3°C
Feels like: -10°C
Humidity: 91%
COM BANNERR. COMMUNITY BANNER
 
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
 
Kelly Road takes on Kipling’s classic tales
Dec 04, 22:42 (Hits: 13) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

WEB

Photo Archive

 

The last of the real choices Print E-mail
Written by -- Associate news editor Rodney Venis   
Wednesday, 01 October 2008
IN STORY NEWS
Welcome to an age of consequences.
The line's not original -- it's the title of a UN report on climate change -- but it neatly sums up that worry in particular and the sentiment that seems to be permeating the news lately that some rough beast's hour has come at last.
Nor is it unique to this time and place -- indeed, there are no doubt people around the world, from Iraq and Moscow to the Darfur and China who feel it's about time the so-called West felt the sharp, short end of the stick.
But it all still feels grossly unfair.
No one here voted for George W. Bush nor had a say in appointing the Supreme Court judges who elected him. No one here crashed a plane full of people into a U.S. monument to prove a theological point or signed the Treaty of Washington that forced Canadian troops into Afghanistan. Yet everyone has to live with the consequences of those choices from the minor irritant of having a bottle of mouthwash seized at the airport to the vaguer concern that our government doesn't really care if any of us ends up being tortured in some faraway land.
As the TV show The Shield said recently, we had a lot of choices once, we made them and now we've got to live with them. Afghanistan is a classic example. Parliament voted last March to extend the mission until 2011 and that means two more years of war because neither Stephane Dion nor Jack Layton are in a position to change that.
Stephen Harper likely won't and, more to the point, he's fairly certain to remain prime minister because of Liberal governments past. No one here took part in the sponsorship scandal, no one here stoked the enmity between Jean Chretien and Paul Martin and few asked for the Gomery inquiry. Yet, thanks to those events, the current sorry state of the Liberal party and the hard Tory-blue nature of Prince George's ridings, there will be nothing to vote for Oct. 14; Canada's latest election will be a blind mathematical exercise that will either give Harper a minority government or a majority.
The list goes on, of choices made by other people whose consequences will affect every household in Prince George from sub-prime mortgages to environmental ignorance and the end of cheap oil. Somehow they bought what we're paying for.
One of the few significant choices the people of this area, collectively, will have left in the next few years will be made on Nov. 15. One mayor, eight councillors and seven school trustees will be elected, along with seven directors in the regional district.
Those thrust into the role of school trustee will find their task even more thankless, with an ever shrinking demographic of school-age children, tighter budgets and the larger question of preparing a generation to compete with their peers in China, India, Brazil, who take far less pay for far more work.
Much, much more will be asked of council -- the days of idly bickering over hockey enforcers, RV boondocking and wondering just how bad the air is are over. This city council faces a looming recession, rising anger over the downtown, a still-simmering gang war and an economic base that is dangerously rickety.
All nine had better show up to work in December with a hard hat, a flak jacket and a plan.
Whether they do so is up to you. The Citizen will do its best to inform you but no newspaper can hold the pencil when you enter the booth.
So this Nov. 15, cast your vote wisely -- because it will be a choice whose consequence you at least had a say in.
-- Associate news editor Rodney Venis
Comments (4)add
Harper has hidden Agenda's!
written by some_gurl , October 02, 2008 (08:08:32 AM)
voting Harper in for a 2nd time woul dbe liek voting Bush in for a 2nd... the country would later regret it.
Harper and Bush's goals are very similiar, and we will suffer if he gets a majority this term.
http://www.voteforenvironment.ca/
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by yeahrite , October 02, 2008 (03:08:53 PM)
Elaborate on this hidden agenda?It is easy to make derogatory remarks, but nice if they are backed up with information of some value.
And, what are the similar goals?? I have been watching this political arena on both sides of the border, and this theory that we will suffer will not be the fault of Harper. Perhaps the onslaught will come as a result of the Republican party and their lack of responsible government while they have been in power. Suffer we will-but not due to Harper.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Hmh
written by StraightUP , October 03, 2008 (12:03:51 PM)
The reason it is called 'hidden' is because you can't see it.

Right now, Prime Minister Harper is piece mealing everything out to everybody.

A little for you, a little for you and a little for you and here: a whole lot for you, you're big business and lets face it, you never hurt the environment.

Last night Harper LIED, or at least tried to obfuscate the facts and Dion was right to call him a liar.

And Dion looked genuinely hurt. And angry! The poor guy.

Obviously he cares very much about the environment. His care and level of concern is transparent to the point that it comes across as almost buffonery and hijinks.

But it is not. So how do you go about balancing books with the environment? Tough job. You have to invest a lot of time and energy into it to come up with a long term plan.

Dion is actually right when he says there is an easy way out that we are not going to take but that the hard way and route doesn't have to be painful or wincing.

The Green Shift doesn't double the taxes and give you half back as Harper said. If it were a poker game, surely Harper "won" as he played his cards really close to his chest.


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by yeahrite , October 03, 2008 (06:10:45 PM)
Speaking of environment-look at where you live-if it is Prince George, and take a long hard look at the environment you are so concerned with-and I will add, so am I.
The air we breathe in this city is so harmful I could, and do on occasion, get right "choked up." Attack the city of Prince George for the lack of concern. Don't bother getting serious about dealing with the environment-just kill off the people with foul air. How much time and energy has been invested in searching for a solution, and acting on resolving this problem?
And, pray tell, is there on the horizon at this time a "long term plan?" Or are there four or five more "studies" about to surface?
If there is, don't hold back, inform the readers. I, for one, would be hesitant to tell people a move to Prince George would be wise.
Dion is one who would cry in his beer. This country does not need him ruling the roost.
After watching that debate, I certainly would not vote for that mouthpiece "May." Her major fault is probably a result of her attendance at Law School.
Harper did not hold his cards close to his chest. You will have knowledge of the Conservatives entire platform prior to voting day.
Not that my opinion is worth a hill of beans, as fortunately, we are Canadians and have the privilege of casting a ballot for the party of our choice.
Luckily, perhaps, that our friends and neighbors do not know where we place that "X."
Exercise your right as a citizen of Canada-and VOTE-as I believe it is your duty to cast a ballot. Even if you have to hold your nose.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 01 October 2008 )
 
 

Who's Online

We have 51 guests and 4 members online