Search | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Temp: -3°C
Feels like: -3°C
Humidity: N/A%
R. COMMUNITY BANNER
 
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
 
Snow forecast to give way to rain by midnight
Jan 06, 16:08 (Hits: 14) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

START LEARNING

Photo Archive

 

View on judges simplistic Print E-mail
Written by Jon Duncan, defence lawyer
Prince George
  
Friday, 15 August 2008
RBC

Related Items

No keywords found
Re: B.C. benchers doing fine job, says top judge (story, Aug. 14).
Our chief judge appears to say that the low number of appeals filed by Crown is a good indicator of the performance of our judges. This suggestion is overly simplistic and wholly misleading. If anything, the low number of appeals is an indicator not of the performance of judges but the rising cost of litigation.
The decision to appeal or not to appeal involves many factors. In my experience as a lawyer, the cost of an appeal is by far the most important factor in deciding whether or not to file. In most cases, although a client may not like the result, the cost is too great to merit further review.
The truth is that there is no easy way to determine whether judges of our courts are performing well. In fact, many of our judges deserve high praise for their work. There are decisions we may question. There are even decisions that are plainly wrong and cannot and should not be supported in principle or law. But this is simply a reminder of the human element involved in the exercise of judicial discretion when sentencing offenders.
Quite frankly, the fact that the public perceives that sentences are too low is an indication not of poor judicial performance, but poor public relations. Media reports of criminal sentencing decisions rarely explain accurately the difficult and careful consideration by sentencing judges and the lawyers of competing sentencing principles. Instead, the public receives a report which overemphasizes the "act" without any consideration of the "context." Factors that must be considered by judges include the impact of the act on the victim, the background of the offender including his or her criminal record, public perceptions, the desire for denunciation and the need for rehabilitation. The sentences which are given are an attempt to balance these and various other factors mandated by our governments.
It is no easy task for lawyers or judges to reach this required balance. In the vast majority of cases, however, if one takes the time to carefully examine all of the reasons behind a judge's decision, the result will be just in all the circumstances.

Comments (4)add
...
written by dhood , August 16, 2008 (10:17:09 AM)
Re-instating the draft to the army and those who like to use guns should have to go to the Middle East and try their hand there. If they have to do time that's the best place for them. Judges are much too lieniant with these Gang members.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Right On, dhood!
written by allniter , August 16, 2008 (01:21:07 PM)
Conscription for convicted violent crimianls would be a good idea. Some time ago in the US, some states gave the idea of conscription a try, sending violent criminals to boot camp. Anyone heard about it lately?

I don't agree with a wholesale draft, though, such as when the Korean and Vietnam wars were occurring. Law-abiding young men were forced to join the Army and, instead of becoming doctors, engineers, etc., at home, they often wound up coming home in body bags.

Selective conscription, though, might even provide a bit of a deterrent, and, best of all, it would provide the discipline to the gang members that they may not have seen at home.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Yes!
written by dhood , August 16, 2008 (02:27:07 PM)
Con-scription, that was actually my son's idea. The 40K Warhammer dude knows more about war than my father who fought in WW2. He's the one who introduced me to www.Zeitgeist Movie. It changes the way you look at the world of politics.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by travhops , August 17, 2008 (06:10:25 AM)
Your letter makes some good points but in so many cases decisions are just too lenient, putting offenders back into society far too soon. Personally I'd like to see the Three Strikes law in Canada. There is great emphasis on a criminal's rights but not enough on victim's rights. If jails are too crowded, build more.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 15 August 2008 )
 
 

Who's Online

We have 204 guests and 12 members online