Search | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Temp: -3°C
Feels like: -6°C
Humidity: N/A%
R. COMMUNITY BANNER
 
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
 
Terms of reference approved for downtown task force
Jan 06, 11:37 (Hits: 35) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

START LEARNING

Photo Archive

 

Validity of public health decisions questioned Print E-mail
Written by Marilyn Juds, Prince George   
Monday, 28 July 2008
IN STORY NEWS

Related Items

The abuse of power phenomenon probably appeared when man first became a social creature. But nowadays the public has no patience with such behaviour. Recall two community issues.
Since September 1955, Prince George drinking water has been fluoridated. In the U.S. a 600-strong group called the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) has called for an end to fluoridation. One member, a Nobel Prize winner, states: “Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology. It’s really obsolete.”
To that end, the Safe Water Coalition, on Feb. 2, 1998, represented by Dave Fuller and Dr. Debra Phair, gave a presentation to our city council requesting a referendum on the issue. The opposing speakers were two doctors and Dr. Lorna Medd. The opposition prevailed. Dr. Medd, as chief medical officer, should have explained both sides of the issue, allowing people to judge for themselves. As it was, she exceeded mightily the bounds of her position.
The other controversy is the flu shot. Every fall the Centers for Disease Control begins a flu season distributing flyers and media campaign materials to public health departments, “planting the seeds in the minds of patients so that they request the flu vaccine when it arrives.” And every fall Dr. Medd would obediently advise the public, from babies on up, to get that flu shot. However, skepticism was growing of the vaccine’s efficacy and its list of troubling ingredients:
Aluminum hydroxide, animal tissues, MSG, henoxyethanol (antifreeze), orbital, formaldehyde, sucrose and Thimerosal, a toxic preservative containing mercury. Most people wouldn’t want their cat exposed to such neurotoxic poison.
Mercury is the second most toxic material on the planet; the first is radioactive plutonium.
The Mad Hatter is a well-known character in the book Alice in Wonderland. Several centuries ago in England, hatters routinely used mercury salts on felt to create stylish hats. Many hatters did eventually go mad.
Additionally, Thimerosal is highly suspect as a contributing cause in the skyrocketing incidence of autism in children.
So how is it that Dr. Medd, in her senior medical capacity, would not know all this? Surely she would have had access to this information. Wouldn’t her mandate require her to warn the public, who paid her salary after all, of any flu vaccination risks?
Unfortunately, for years Dr. Medd used her position of power to push through her personal agenda. It’s time for serious damage control. No longer will we tolerate betrayal of trust. We have the privilege of expecting better within the public domain.
For more information: Vaccination Risk Awareness Network: www.vran.org
-- Marilyn Juds
Prince George
Comments (2)add
...
written by BDL , July 28, 2008 (09:59:57 AM)
I am sure that Dr. Medd was fully aware of the material mentioned. I am also absolutely sure that Dr. Medd was aware of much more information that was required in her professional capacity that the writer hasn't a clue about.

In other words, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but Dr. Medd had a lot of knowledge and was quite capable of making recommendations that were in the public interest, even when they did not meet the pleasure of those with a monofocus.

Sucrose is a neurotoxic poison, is it? Sucrose is the chemical name for sugar, the stuff we buy by the pound from grocery stores. It may rot your teeth, true, but a neurotoxin?

Mercury hasn't been used to felt hats since Victorian times, so what is the relevance of that today? In fact, mercury salts are banned in many jurisdictions. Scaremongering with irrelevant and suspect data is hardly being informative to the public. It is, in fact, a means to mislead them.

If you don't want the flu shot, don't have it. It is not compulsory. Those of us that do want it can then continue to get it and reduce the risk of our getting sick during the flue season. It is called choice.

Why you would want to discredit Dr. Medd is beyond me, especially as she is no longer a Medical Health Officer in Prince George, having semi-retired to Vancouver Island. Another failure to get some facts by Ms. Juds, perhaps?


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Buzz , July 28, 2008 (10:20:26 AM)
Dr. Medd is an honourable and professional person who does not deserve to be labelled with "abuse of power" type of statements. I can also do my own research, using a rather narrow set of criterea (e.g. "Christian" research)and find all sorts of claims and theories and so called 'facts'. That does not override the fact that is a lot more evidence that contradicts special interest 'researchers'. I commend Ms. Juds on making her own conclusions and following her own beliefs (within limits, for example, I'm not so sure about J.W.'s preventing their kids from receiving life saving blood transfusions)but if she chooses to not give her kids vaccinations or if she wants to deny that fluoride has had positive benefits, (and I might also remind Ms. Juds that our life expentency and seniors quality of life continues to get better and better despite all of these 'evil' medical advances) then that's her choice in a free society. But PLEASE don't trash a very respectable and good public figure just because you don't agree with some of her expertise.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Sunday, 07 September 2008 )
 
 

Who's Online

We have 243 guests and 13 members online