Search | Login | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Prince George Citizen Friday, August 29, 2008
Temp: 8°C
Feels like: 7°C
Humidity: 93%
 
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
Loading...
 
Historian to visit Sept. 17
Aug 29, 15:35 (Hits: 47) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

ONLINE

Gallery

 

Regardless of report card, Canada still best place to live Print E-mail
Written by Todd Whitcombe   
Sunday, 06 July 2008
It doesn't happen often, but I find myself agreeing wholeheartedly with my fellow columnist, Bruce Strachan. Canada is the best place to live.
I would go even farther and say "B.C. is the best place on Earth."
(Carbon tax aside, of course!)
And Prince George has to be one of the best cities in the province. Sure, we don't have the surf, turf, and mountains of Vancouver.
But we also don't have the traffic congestion, the smog, and the line ups.
We do have some of the most incredible outdoor recreational opportunities right on our doorsteps. We have a wide range of services, from some fantastic restaurants to two hockey teams. And we definitely still have affordable housing where a family can still manage to live.
But even if you don't agree with me about Prince George or B.C. for that matter, most Canadians think that Canada is the best country in the world. We love our country.
I know that, as Canadians, we do not blow our own horns with quite the same fervor as our neighbours to the south. Talking about how great Canada is seems to be, well, un-Canadian. It's just not something we do.
Still, it was a bit surprising to read the below-the-fold headline in Monday's paper: "Canada's quality of life slipping." The day before our birthday, too!!
The highlights from the Conference Board of Canada report card on Canada were released this past week and they say that Canada is not the great place we think it is.
My first response, upon reading the article, was "who is this Conference Board of Canada and why are they saying this?" I started to dig a little. It is not that hard as they have a website with the pertinent information.
Up front, they do make the point that the preliminary report card lacks the detailed depth of the full report. This won't be released until September. And without the detailed report, it is hard to know exactly what was the methodology used in coming to their conclusions. From the little I was able to glean from their site, they use a number of indicators in each of six categories to score some 17 countries.
Canada's ranking, within this class of 17, has slipped towards the back of the class - to ninth overall when we used to be fourth. Or, at least, so claims the Conference Board.
It further points out that Canada is like a gifted student that started out strong but is coasting toward the bottom of the class. Of course, this is a class of gifted students. The 16 other countries represent the best economies in the world. Not the largest but the best.
I am not sure why "report cards" have come into vogue over the past decade. Seems that everyone wants to provide a report card on something. The Fraser Institute, for example, hands out its annual report card on education and the World Wildlife Fund does one on the environment.
What these "report cards" fail to do, though, is to tell us what a grade means. Is a B grade good, bad, or indifferent? I certainly know that if my child came home with all Bs, I would be happy with their performance. All As would be better, but Bs certainly beat Fs!
So, when the Conference Board gives our economy a "B", what are they saying? Apparently, according to their methodology, the fundamentals underpinning a strong economy are in place. We have booming resource industries, fiscal surpluses, a strong currency, modest inflation, and the lowest unemployment rates in 30 years. But that just isn't good enough.
Excuse me? Seems pretty good to me.
Still, they say: "Canada must do more to make sure its economic performance is strong enough to ensure a high and sustainable quality of life for all its citizens."
Just how would we do that? "Canada needs to work smarter to improve productivity," they say. And there it is. We are doing very well, by any number of standards. But the Conference Board thinks that Canadian workers are lazy. They are simply not generating the output per person that other countries generate. Or maybe we have too many workers for the amount of output we produce.
Either way, the Conference Board wants us to produce more for less. Where have I heard that before?
This is where it is useful to realize who sits on the board. It is made up of the CEOs and presidents of companies. In that context, it is not that surprising that their report card would suggest that we are not living up to our potential. The "type A" personalities at the top always want more out of their companies.
But is that the sort of thing that should influence a report card?
Probably not. And it is certainly not going to make me change my mind.
Canada is the best place to live.
-- Dr. Todd Whitcombe is a professor at UNBC and a politically active member of the community. His column appears Mondays. E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Comments (3)add
...
written by allniter , July 07, 2008 (11:55:54 PM)
The one factor in the slippage on the report card could very well be that there is a lot more Underemployment in Canada now. In this area, a huge number of forestry workers suddenly find themselves with a prospect of far lesser jobs than the ones they had. Employment figures only count the number of jobs held, not the quality of the jobs, and the quality of employment available has been circling the bowl for years.

For many workers, BC is becoming The Best Place On Earth to be out of.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Mike S , July 08, 2008 (07:06:35 AM)
One slight correction to the original letter. Vancouver, for all intents and purposes, does not have smog. It's air quality is actually known as one more 'plus' for the city. Any smog that exists settles further east in the Fraser Valley - places like Chilliwack and Abbotsford.

I agree, Allniter with your premises, but I think that places like Ontario, with all it's manufacturing, etc., that have an impact on Canada-wide reports.

I think Canada is the best place on earth. Sometimes I have those moments... a logical 'stab'.. that tells me I haven't lived in places like Norway, Sweden or even Australia, so I might be a bit biased. Still, I'm very happy to stay where I am.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by allniter , July 10, 2008 (11:57:06 PM)
Don't get me wrong--Canada's still a pretty cool place, IMO, and that is precisely why I write my MLA's and MP's as often as I do. An e-mail and a hard copy in the mailbox (no postage required).

Back in the 80's and 90's I was quite active, politically, and although I'm not so much now, I do pay very close attention to what's going on out there. One of the greatest threats to online privacy is Bill C-61, tabled June 12 in the House Of Commons, and that one kept me pretty busy lately--but it's important enough that I feel the effort is worth it. Keyboard's gettin' wore out!

Voter turnout was pretty dismal during the last federal election, but Bill C-61 may actually motivate some otherwise jaded citizens to peel themselves off the couch and go to the polling station. That is a really good thing. I run into the odd person who says they aren't going to vote, and that statement gets them an impromptu history lesson from yours truly. Politicians love apathy, so it is up to us, ultimately, to keep this country great.

Cheers!




report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Sunday, 06 July 2008 )
 
  The Northern

Who's Online

We have 96 guests and 7 members online