Search | Login | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Prince George Citizen Thursday, August 28, 2008
Temp: 14°C
Feels like: 14°C
Humidity: 77%
SPORTS BANNER  
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
Loading...
 
Judge orders continued detention of city man
Aug 28, 15:09 (Hits: 40) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

WEB

Gallery

 

Beetle logging could be hurting forests, wildlife Print E-mail
Written by GORDON HOEKSTRA
Citizen staff
  
Tuesday, 10 June 2008
IN STORY SPORTS

Related Items


BURNS LAKE
There is mounting evidence that salvage logging of pine beetle-killed stands causes more ecological degradation than leaving them alone, scientist Phil Burton told a forum at UNBC on Tuesday.
Given that only about one-third of the beetle-impacted area is made up of pure lodgepole pine stands, and given that the dominant form of harvesting is clear-cut logging, when salvage operations take place they are also removing the secondary forest structure, he said on the opening day of a two-day forum on the impacts of the pine beetle.
That secondary structure -- particularly the non-pine species -- could provide timber for mills in 20 to 40 years so is important from a mid-term timber supply perspective, explained Burton, who works with the Canadian Forest Service in Prince George.
It is an issue that communities in the heart of the beetle-epidemic are particularly concerned about, given the mid-term timber supply is forecast to drop about 40 per cent in the next decade, and even greater in some communities. The decrease in timber supply will bring a decrease in traditional forest-based jobs in many of the forest-based communities. The Canadian Forest Service has estimated that a conservative 22-per-cent decrease in the timber supply, will cause 600 job losses in Burns Lake and Houston. In Prince George, a conservative 17-per-cent decrease in the timber supply would cause a job loss of 2,900.
Burton said the salvage logging can also have an impact on wildlife habitat given the large areas of salvage logging. It is important that wildlife have snags and brush to hide in, or they will be forced off the land and be compromised, he said.
Wide-spread salvage logging is also an issue for carbon loss, as there are projections that show a greater loss of carbon from salvage-logged areas, he said. Carbon loss is an issue in climate change as carbon is considered a greenhouse gas, in part, responsible for warming temperatures.
The forum, organized by the Forest Research Extension Partnership (FORREX), a non-profit organization which partners with industry and government, is meant to provide an opportunity for scientists and industry and community leaders to share lessons learned from the epidemic and explore community-based solutions.
Bill Bourgeois, a B.C. forest-industry consultant, stressed that the impacts of the beetle epidemic are significant: three quarters of the lodgepole pine forecast to be killed and 180 communities impacted. The impact on the forest industry is forecast to be a 40 per cent reduction in the Interior, 19 per cent provincially, noted Bourgeois, who based his presentation on a overview analysis of the current research on the epidemic impacts.
"It's not a trivial impact," he said.
He pointed out that some communities are more vulnerable than others with the Cheslatta First Nation, Burns Lake and Quesnel at the top of the list. However, economic dependance on the forest sector is not the only determinant of how successful communities will be dealing with the impacts of the epidemic. Bourgeois said social considerations such as a willingness to change are also important.
He suggested that tourism provided the best opportunity for replacing jobs, but acknowledged that while the forestry jobs may be replaced the economic contribution wouldn't be the same.
Bourgeois said bioenergy -- which is being heavily promoted by the provincial government -- is not a cure-all for the impacts of the epidemic. It's why government strategies to diversify communities must be customized, he said. "One size fits all doesn't work."
Bourgeois also offered a warning, noting that by 2020 there will be suitable habitat for the beetle through to Manitoba.
He said while the reaction to large-scale disturbances usually focuses on analyzing the impacts and mitigation, much less energy is spent on adaptation, which needs more attention.
Comments (8)add
...
written by Buddy , June 11, 2008 (04:57:08 AM)
Where do they get these people? Fire is much more devastating and that will happen if you leave the beetle kill standing. I suppose this study didn't include tinder dry conditions and lightning or a tossed cigarette butt or a campfire. Leave the trees and then watch them burn.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by yeahrite , June 11, 2008 (10:21:49 AM)
Watch the trees burn-watch the towns burn, watch wild life be destroyed, watch the government go broke fighting uncontrollable forest fires-but do not log off "dead wood."
Anybody take note we are to experience a hotter than normal summer? Makes for some pretty fine thunder storms, usually accompanied by lightning-and lightening strikes are known to hit forested areas. Forested areas normally have towns, communities, cities in close proximity, and lightening strikes are not limited to uninhabited areas.
Even a rocket scientist is aware of the dangers-let alone a forestry scientist?
Even the insurance companies will be shaking in their shoes. Either that or simply refusing to insure certain properties.
Oh my-say it isn't so????
As for tourism replacing jobs-give me a break! I am sure people will be just trucking all over the country with the high price of travel, and fuel. Lucky if they can pay their bills at home and pay for the food on the table-as the surcharges are now surfacing in many areas.
Man, I have the greatest respect for that over abused word as a cure all--"DIVERSIFY.'
DIVERSIFY to what??? Lots of big talk-but that is all it amounts to--big talk.
Anybody tired of listening?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
...
written by allniter , June 11, 2008 (12:15:18 PM)
Both posters here are right. These experts are so far removed from the actual situation it hurts. Not only will those fires they refer to put inhabited areas under extreme threat, the smoke from those fires has the potential for making a lot of people very sick.


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by Buddy , June 11, 2008 (02:20:05 PM)
I don't think "know it all" is a fair assessesment but it is your opinion. Remember the "forest practices code" that the MOF put in place. Dumb, dumb, dumb and they are the "experts". If the beetle kill isn't harvested the forest is going to burn. The lost of wildlife will be catastrophic.

Do a study into value added for the beetle kill. Furnature, pellets, whatever. Since we can't sell the lumber then do a study into what else can be done with the wood. But it should be harvested or it'll be up in smoke. Maybe not this year but next year or the year after and then it's just a waste.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
...
written by allniter , June 11, 2008 (07:56:23 PM)
...another factor in the mix...some of the worst fires in the past few years have been deliberately set, if I recall correctly...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Burn it
written by Thoughtful , June 11, 2008 (10:44:22 PM)
Burn it in huge mega energy production schemes, move huge mobile hogs out to various sites, and start making hog fuel. Hog fuel can be stored and used for infinite sources rather than just left as dead standing trees. We gotta start regrowing these forests pronto, in order to restart our carbon sink, and contribute to society. It's only a year ago I seen a black bear speared by a fallen top from bug kill, so lets just do something now, rather than wait till it is all to rotten to do anything with...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by chillin , June 15, 2008 (12:48:06 PM)
how sweet it is. Buzz's comment was rated so low it had the message( this comment rated so low you must click on to read). Well if you look at all the experts on bug kill you would have a good argument for both sides. However being an avid outdoors man I wouldn't want to even be in the province if a wild fire hit and all the bug kill was left standing.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 10 June 2008 )
 
  TUNDRA

Who's Online

We have 155 guests and 4 members online