Search | Login | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Prince George Citizen Thursday, July 24, 2008
Temp: 20°C
Feels like: 20°C
Humidity: 46%
COM BANNERCOM BAN RH SIDE
 
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
Loading...
 
Canoe Mountain Resort proposal shelved
Jul 24, 15:50 (Hits: 65) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

NORTH 54 LEFT RAIL

Gallery

 
Alarmists selective about what information is released Print E-mail
Written by -- Art Betke
Prince George
  
Friday, 16 May 2008
CONCERNED
Global warming alarmists are rather selective about the information they release. While scientists were quick to raise the alarm of the smallest-ever recorded area of Arctic sea ice this past summer, they neglected the cause - unusual winds that blew the ice into warmer waters.
They also neglected to mention that the entire southern hemisphere was undergoing a record cold winter and Antarctic sea ice reached the greatest-ever recorded area. The following southern summer was also unusually cool, while the northern hemisphere was experiencing a much colder than normal winter and Arctic sea ice recovered to its 1980 extent. Both southern and northern hemispheres? That’s the entire globe. That's global cooling.
In fact there has been no global warming since 1998, the second-warmest year on record (1934 was warmest). 1998 was an El Nino year so it could be argued that it shouldn’t count, but still, temperatures remained static for the past seven years, until 2007 which saw a huge cooling. As skeptics have repeatedly pointed out, those temperature fluctuations are in sync with solar fluctuations, not carbon-dioxide emissions.
Alarmists ignored the evidence and insisted that temperatures were still increasing. Lately some of them have admitted the warming has ceased and cooling has begun (it’s getting pretty difficult to deny anymore), but they claimed that the current global cooling is being caused by -- global warming. The mind boggles. They must have realized how silly that sounds so the latest claim is that human-caused global warming is being temporarily overridden by natural climate variations. Those would be the same variations that they heretofore claimed didn’t exist.
While most alarmists are still promoting the warming agenda, for those who admit that the warming has stopped it’s necessary to find ways to continue the gravy train. After all, billions of government dollars are being pumped into the global warming industry every year and the next U.S. president (whoever it will be) seems likely to vastly increase global-warming spending and regulations.
The many vested interests of the global warming industry are on the cusp of a financial and political bonanza, something that scientific facts and climatic realities could ruin. So when global temperature doesn’t behave the way they want, excuses and explanations must be found to prevent the almost-mature golden goose from being roasted for dinner.
Expect global warming proponents to sound ever more ridiculous if cooling continues.
-- Art Betke
Prince George
Comments (4)add
Good points
written by Shawn Petriw , May 17, 2008 (09:02:26 AM)
While I enjoyed the filmmaking of the producers of "An Inconvenient Truth," I was always uneasy with the dependence on one graph by one person (the famed hockey stick).

Two films I recommend people view for balance are "The Great Global Warming Swindle" and the CBC documentary "Global Warming Doomsday Called Off." These can be found on google video:

video.google.com

And I also feel people should read what the leading scientists were saying in 1975 about the threat to our food supply due to global cooling fears. It's a good thing we didn't implement some of their recommendations!

http://www.denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by islandplans , May 17, 2008 (09:50:25 AM)
Alarmists are selective? Perhaps ostriches are even more selective. Because both hemispheres were cooler one year that indicates global cooling? One or two years suddenly indicates a trend?

Is there a source for the statements "...no global warming since 1998..." and "...temperatures remained static for the past seven years, until 2007.."? I see contradictory statistics here:
"..2005 was the warmest year since the late 1800s, according to NASA scientists. 1998, 2002 and 2003 and 2004 followed as the next four warmest years. Credit: NASA.."
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/environment/2005_warmest.html

Or same evidence here: "..The decade of 1998-2007 is the warmest on record, according to data sources obtained by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)..".
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071213101419.htm

NASA and the WMO. Fairly reputable. Please provide your sources.

The last statement of the original letter is meaningless speculation and could easily be stated in reverse.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by islandplans , May 17, 2008 (09:53:41 AM)
Another item mentioned in the letter is the 'money' factor, somehow accusing the scientists of promoting global warming to continue/increase research funding. The irony here is laughable, as the real group with money interests are companies such as oil, which fund many of the studies which disagree with mainstream science. I would not be surprised if oil-subsidized 'research' provided the misinformation listed in the original letter.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
in 40 days?
written by Sojourn , May 19, 2008 (09:04:31 PM)
What if in reality we are simply due for the earth's axis shift?

This could all be meaningless.

Goodnight all.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -2
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 16 May 2008 )
 
 
 

Who's Online

We have 129 guests and 4 members online