Search | Login | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Prince George Citizen Thursday, May 22, 2008
Temp: 12°C
Feels like: 12°C
Humidity: 58%
RUNNING  
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
Loading...
 
Mackenzie plans rally to save town
May 22, 03:00 (Hits: 131) -- Comments: (0)
 

My Account

Win $10,000
 
Puppy mills targeted Print E-mail
Written by Citizen Staff   
Sunday, 11 May 2008
The Prince George SPCA is cracking down on puppy mills, closing two of them down already in the local region and about half a dozen more in their sights.
"I know there are at least five large-scale operations that I am aware of between Quesnel and Vanderhoof," said SPCA Special Const. Debbie Goodine, stopping short of calling any of them currently engaged in illegal activity. "We will monitor them. There are standards and there are consequences for not living up to those standards."
Goodine said the law allows anyone buying and selling animals the opportunity to fix any shortfalls they may have in the care of those animals before Goodine can seize the livestock and/or lay charges. She has been in contact with these vendors in question to explain how living conditions have to improve for their dogs.
"Food is not usually the issue," Goodine explained, describing the typical conditions she sees at delinquent puppy mills. "Usually it is the sanitation, the ventilation, enrichment of the dogs' lives which basically means opportunity for mental stimulation, socialization, medical care, and spacing can be a concern, either too many dogs in one space or animals in too much isolation."
Goodine said it is "absolutely possible with the right facilities and the right knowledge," to have a dog breeding operation that meets all standards of animal care. However, typically the people who attempt to make money selling puppies and run afoul of animal abuse laws are doing so not based on a sound business plan but more to supplement subsistence incomes. Often they are in rural areas far from everyday public scrutiny.
Goodine said most are noncompliant only out of ignorance of the law and basic hygiene. They are not trying to deliberately hurt animals and most take steps to comply when she directs them to do so. Alternately, some freely give up ownership of the maltreated animals.
She has experienced more than one case of danger, however, at the hands of animal abusers so she always approaches alleged puppy mill operations with caution. Unlike other law enforcement officials, she is not authorized to carry a firearm and she is often out of cell phone range in remote locations.
"I've had people come at me up the driveway with rifles or machetes," she said. "The RCMP is really good about coming with me to enforce the peace if I have reason to believe I might be threatened. But I don't always know what I'm going to meet up with. If people abuse their animals, they are typically not the kind of person to behave gently with people."
"The law provides me with the power of inspection for anyone who has animals for sale, hire or exhibition," she added. "I do not need to give any notice. If I believe there are animals in distress and I get a door shut in my face, there are my grounds to get a warrant, and with the new regulations provided by the provincial government, I can now get that warrant over the phone while I am standing there."
The new regulations also expanded the definition of animal distress to include such living conditions as ventilation, appropriate living space and access to veterinary care when needed.
Goodine said another key document has been recently revamped to help the dog breeding industry. The Code of Practise For Canadian Kennel Operations is about a year old, written by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association. She suggests anyone who sells puppies should familiarize themselves with this book to ensure their own operation is within guidelines.
Comments (9)add
Puppy mills targeted
written by yeahrite , May 14, 2008 (08:20:55 AM)
I have not heard a lot of good reports on the "puppy mills" located in Quesnel and Kersley. I have heard of sick puppies being sold that had a very short life span-like only days after being sold to a new owner. Even to the point whereby a puppy had to be euthanized when taken to a vet within a couple days.
These breeders have no conscience. Breeding dogs in outside sheds-cold, damp, isolated. If these inconsiderate breeders have to make a living off these poor little animals, they are very poor specimens of humanity.
I had one lady explain gleefully how her old dog, (small breed), had become pregnant while being cared for by someone else-had 8 puppies, and she was looking forward to a $2,000.00 boost to her income. She does not care to speak to me after I voiced my opinion re her pleased attitude. I would not even consider cultivating a friendship with such a woman.
I am 100% behind the closing of "puppy mills," and once again, I can only commend Debbie Goodine for her actions in this regard.
Stop these ignorant people from capitalizing on the misfortune of these poor animals which have no voice or choice.
For those who do not get found out-how I hope it is true-"what goes around-comes around." I hope the payback is painful, and long term.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
Well said yeahrite
written by allniter , May 14, 2008 (07:23:56 PM)
I, too, wish to add my support to Constable Goodine in this undertaking. I, for one, couldn't do what she does--it takes exceptional personal strength that not too many of us possess.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Nessie , May 14, 2008 (09:46:43 PM)
While I also applaud Debbie Goodine's efforts in the battle against Puppy Milling, I am dissapointed with the way in which the article seems to imply how "dog breeeding operations" can be a-OK. In this day and age, I am disgusted at how people continue to breed dogs with the sole intent of profit and monetary personal gain. There is such a thing as an ethical, moral, and responsible breeder, and a "dog breeding operation" most certainly does not fall under this description. Lack of knowledge demonstrates that such "breeders" should most definately NOT be breeding dogs...period. It is unfortunate that such people are given so many chances to "rectify" their "breeding practices" so that they can continue to profit on the misery of the poor dogs that they only own for the purposes of "production". And where do so many of these dogs end up? Many in the shelter system, euthanized, tossed aside and disposed of when the novelty wears off - the lucky ones may find homes. And BTW, buying a puppy from such people is completely "Buyer Beware". A very large number of them have serious health and behavioural issues due to the poor breeding practices that are employed by such "dog breeding operations" - even those who do conform to basic hygiene needs of their dogs.

That cute "doggie in the window" for sale at your pet store comes from such operations/poor breeding practices, as do those that you see advertised in papers for a few hundred bucks (and yes, those whose "parents can be viewed", and the increasingly popular "designer" and "non-hypoallergenic" dogs). It's all about money for these "breeders", not at all about what it truly should be about - true betterment of the breed and most importantly, the dog.

For anyone considering bringing a dog into your home, I highly encourage and very much hope that you will take a few moments to visit "No Puppy Mills Canada" to help you in making a smart and informed decision, and one that does not support the multitude of Puppy Millers and Back Yard Breeders that are rampant even close around us!

http://www.nopuppymillscanada.ca/

Make the right choice...opt to adopt or only purchase from a respectable, reptuable, ethical breeder. Don't be a supporter of Puppy Millers and Back Yard Breeders!

And shame on those who post ads looking for a dog to breed their dog to...for what purpose? Obviously NOT sound breeding practices. Go to the shelter and look into the eyes of all the dogs that are begging for a home and to be loved. Many that you see will be euthanized because there are not enough homes for all of them. In addition to those people who are not ethical and responsible breeders who continue to refuse to spay and neuter their dogs, it is such "breeders" that have contributed to the needless deaths and misery of so many dogs.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
...
written by Nessie , May 14, 2008 (09:50:22 PM)
PS: My apologies for the above typos - it's late and I forgot to spell check first!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by travhops , May 14, 2008 (11:58:35 PM)
I take high exception to some of the above comments. I have been and am still, on a limited basis, a dog breeder. Ethical dog breeders are preserving a breed. My puppies are all vet checked, given shots and homes are carefully selected. As a matter of fact, I have a long waiting list for puppies. I never breed a female under 2 1/2 to three years old, study temperament. Homes for dogs are selected carefully, there is follow-up and there is total joy in placing the right puppy with its new home. I abhor puppy mills, backyard breeders who will breed any two dogs. I am constantly called by people who want to breed their Heinz 57 or who are angry I refuse to breed their purebred that is in heat, even though it's 8 months old, a year old, shows aggression, etc. There are many respectable breeders, which is why we have so many breeds of dogs preserved. Adoption can be wonderful but can also be a disaster. A potential buyer cannot research the breeds and decide which is suitable. Also I, as do "respectable breeders", sell dogs on a contract that includes spaying or neutering, as most breeders do. Which, by the way, is a good indication of a puppy mill - they rarely, if ever, insist the puppy you bought be fixed. Also, if planning to get a dog, educate yourself on breed, temperament, which breeds have a record of being suitable for children, which are aggressive, etc. Never buy a dog that hasn't been vaccinated, has not been vet checked (each puppy will have a record of shots and health certificate), when in doubt ask the breeder to meet you at the vet of your choice for an exam (no real breeder will refuse this), beware of breeders who claim they do their own vaccinations. Even if the dog is vaccinated, give it a week or two before exposing it to other dogs, make sure the puppy has fully developed teeth, is not still nursing. Be aware and you'll get a healthy, happy addition to your family. I recently had friends who bought an uncommon breed from an out of town breeder who was here in PG selling pups. It was 12 weeks old, given shots by the breeder on the day of purchase. Three days later it was sick, diagnosed with Parvo. The dog was saved but the vet bill was $1200. They chose the "quietest" dog in the litter. When viewing puppies look for alertness, curiosity. Better yet, if not knowledgeable, take someone with you who is. Don't just look at pups, look at the facility - alert, healthy dogs, cleanliness, check water dishes that it's clean, fresh water and the dish is clean. Don't buy a breed that is a current fad without research. I'm remembering the disaster after "101 Dalmations". Shelters were full of them as people bought them in droves, not aware of the breed characteristics. A good breeder will give you contact information for any questions and will want to know how the puppy is doing. Just as you don't want a dog from an irresponsible breeder, I do not want one of my beautiful puppies going to an irresponsible owner and yes, I have more than once sent away a very angry person that I've refused to sell a dog to. It's not on a first come basis. If I don't feel you'll look after the dog properly, you will not walk out of my house with it. There are many dog breeding operations that are A-OK and because of them many nearly extinct breeds are preserved. Don't lump them all together.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Hi travhops!
written by allniter , May 15, 2008 (02:01:12 AM)
I like to think that good, caring, ethical breeders build new friendships between great owners and great dogs--I especially like the fact that you wouldn't sell a puppy to just anyone. Your post reminded me of a couple from Burns Lake I knew years ago--they were the same way and I thought the world of them for that.

I hope Const. Goodine can make headway with shutting down unethical breeders, because too often good breeders get tarred by the same brush.

Maybe I'll be lucky enough to meet one of your puppies on one of my walks :)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
travhops
written by MustBMe , May 15, 2008 (04:20:52 AM)
What exactly are you taking exception to? It sounds like you have the same complaints as everyone else. I didnt see where anyone said "reputable and ethical" breeders should be put out of business. If you run your breeding business as you say then you will have no worries.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by travhops , May 15, 2008 (05:01:06 AM)
"I am dissapointed with the way in which the article seems to imply how "dog breeeding operations" can be a-OK. In this day and age, I am disgusted at how people continue to breed dogs with the sole intent of profit and monetary personal gain."

That's what I take exception to. There are many large, ethical breeders. Many make or subdizide their living from dog breeding and they are not unethical or disgusting.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
...
written by Nessie , May 15, 2008 (09:46:33 AM)
travhops, thank you for highlighting some of the more specific information that helps to clarify what constitutes an ethical breeder. However, as a matter of clarification for the use of my above quote, I believe that you may have misread my above entry.

As you yourself have pointed out, "Ethical dog breeders are preserving a breed". I noted in my original posting that I am disgusted by those breeders who breed only for the monetary gain - hence what I am saying is that large scale breeders who do so with only this in mind and who therefore are negating the ethical practices that go along with "preserving the breed" (health screening for genetic conditions, non-bredding contracts, potential home screening etc) are those which I refer to as "disgusting". There are far more large scale "breeding operations" that operate in this unethical manner for sole monetary gain than there are ethical large breeding operations who do actually conform to ethical and moral breeding practices.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Sunday, 11 May 2008 )
 
 
  CLASS OF 2008

Who's Online

We have 206 guests and 4 members online

557