Search | Login | Letter to the Editor | Contact Us
Prince George Citizen Friday, May 16, 2008
Temp: 25°C
Feels like: 24°C
Humidity: 26%
RUNNING  
Find a CarFind a Car
Find a HouseFind a House
TV ListingsTV Listings
Loading...
 
Weigh scale tender deadline delayed
May 16, 15:28 (Hits: 26) -- Comments: (0)

My Account

BIKE ALONG 08
 
NCMA delegates call for break on carbon tax Print E-mail
Written by MARK NIELSEN
Citizen staff
  
Thursday, 08 May 2008
RBC IN STORY WEB AD
North Central Municipal Association delegates endorsed resolutions from seven northern B.C. local governments Thursday calling on the provincial government to give the region a break on the carbon tax that will come into effect on Canada Day.
The resolutions were passed as a block with little debate and just a few hours after NDP leader Carol James echoed delegates' concerns and consistently referred to the measure as a "gas" tax.
She accused Premier Gordon Campbell of developing the tax in secret.
"For one year the premier went off and put together his gas tax and announced it without discussion and without consultation," she said and added there is growing resentment over the measure.
"In smaller communities, I hear from people who ask how on earth they're expected to change their behaviour when there are no alternatives there for them," she said. "If you live in Mackenzie and you have to drive to Prince George to see a specialist, you have to make that drive whether the gas tax is there or not."
The carbon tax, effective July 1, will be phased in over five years, starting at a rate based on $10 per tonne of carbon emissions and rising $5 a year to $30 per tonne by 2012.
The tax works out to an extra 2.4 cents on a litre of gasoline, rising to 7.24 cents per litre of gasoline by 2012. The carbon tax on diesel and home heating oil will start at 2.7 cents per litre and increase to 8.2 cents per litre over the same five-year period.
During consideration of the resolutions, Mayor Colin Kinsley said the tax will cost the city an estimated $110,000 a year in fuel and heating costs which could have been spent on improving Prince George's transit system.
He also said that Prince George experiences 5,250 hours a year of "degree days" when heat is required compared to just 2,950 in Vancouver and a whopping 7,000 in Fort Nelson.
Coun. Don Zurowski said the carbon tax will only hinder a struggling forest industry and is only revenue neutral when the industry is profitable.
"It's a B.C. forest industry disadvantage and that is concerning," he said.
Coun. Brian Skakun, who championed Prince George's resolution, said the carbon tax won't have any effect on his behaviour because northern B.C. winters are simply to cold for him to lower his thermostat or refrain from warming up his vehicle.
"People on fixed incomes are going to get hit, businesses that have to heat their buildings are going to get nailed and it's not a level playing field," he said.
Prince George-Omineca MLA John Rustad, who sat in on the discussion stressed afterwards that effect on people on fixed incomes was taken into consideration when the tax was developed and they'll get a break on their income tax as a result.
Each taxpayer will receive a $100 cheque to offset the money they lost to the levy. As well, the bottom two personal income tax rates will be cut by two per cent in 2008 and five per cent in 2009 on the first $70,000 in earnings.
"It's not so much an increase in tax as it's a shift and what we've said is if you're using carbon you'll be paying a tax on that and if you reduce that use, you pay less in taxes," he said.
Rustad, who drives about 30,000 kilometres a year, estimated the carbon tax will add about $60 to his gas bills. However, Rustad saw some merit in municipalities concerns about the effect on their costs, saying he's not sure if local governments will get rebates.
"It's something I need to look into," he said.
Prince George North MLA Pat Bell maintained northern B.C. will actually be a net gainer once other carbon-reduction initiatives are taken into account.
"We could see easily into the billion-dollar-plus range in investment in bioengery across the region," he said. "We've made a big commitment to a biodiesel plant, $10 million there.
"Those are all investments that are made as a result of a commitment to a climate-change agenda. You don't kind of get to have it both ways, either you're in or you're out."
Comments (3)add
what a joke
written by sledhead37 , May 08, 2008 (08:46:43 PM)
mr rustad must be nice that ure fuel costs r covered by us taxpayers. i can see u dont drive from mackenzie to prince george with your gas budget cause most of us have to drive a 4wd truck to safely drive the highway during the winter and that 10 bucks your government is so kindly giving us will pay for 1 trip in the winter. or a half tank of gas. maybe if vancouvers overpopulated and polluted vancouver should pay 2 clean it up not us northern communities
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
oops
written by sledhead37 , May 08, 2008 (08:48:33 PM)
sorry its actually 100 bucks ure giving us to tax us higher on all of our necessities. u guys gonna start imposing a luxury tax on us for food next?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by MustBMe , May 09, 2008 (05:19:06 AM)
What are the "bottom two personal income taxes"? I am sure hes not referring to the federal income tax as one of them, since this is a provincial tax. The provincial tax sits at 6% for lower income people, so how are they going to cut 7% in the next two years? Or is this cut just for those who make over $70,000.00/year? How does cutting the personal income tax on high wage earners benefit those on limited or low income? Lots of people of low income have to commute to work as well, why dont they get an income tax break?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 08 May 2008 )
 
 
  RIGHT RAIL

Who's Online

We have 105 guests and 3 members online

557